Stephen B. Cox

85 papers receiving 5.1k citations

Peers

Stephen B. Cox
Comparison fields: 5 of 179
  • Soil Science 537
  • Ecological Modeling 238
  • Rehabilitation 298
  • Pollution 563
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 595
Replace Peter D. Steinberg with:
Peter D. Steinberg Australia
Elizabeth K. Costello United States
Robert G. Beiko Canada
James S. Huntley United Kingdom
Nicholas A. Bokulich United States
Laura Wegener Parfrey Canada
Scott T. Kelley United States
William A. Walters United States
Andrew Han United States
Gang Wang China
Stephen B. Cox relative to Peter D. Steinberg Australia Peter D. Steinberg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Peter D. Steinberg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen B. Cox

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen B. Cox's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen B. Cox with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen B. Cox more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen B. Cox

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen B. Cox. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen B. Cox. The network helps show where Stephen B. Cox may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen B. Cox, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen B. Cox Line = papers co-authored together Stephen B. Cox links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 87 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006492
2 2015310
3 2014305
4 2015297
5 2011233
6 2000203
7 2009195
8
Species richness, species-area curves and Simpson's paradox
2000187
9 2012168
10 2003154
11 2013152
12 2005147
13 2008144
14 2012135
15 2014131
16 2008115
17 2013109
18 200697
19 200892
20 201677

About Stephen B. Cox

Stephen B. Cox is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Pollution, Ecology and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 87 papers that have together received 5.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (8 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (8 papers), Gut microbiota and health (7 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (7 papers), Heavy metals in environment (7 papers), Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (7 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (6 papers) and Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Soil Science (537 citations), Ecological Modeling (238 citations), Rehabilitation (298 citations), Pollution (563 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (595 citations). Stephen B. Cox has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and China. Frequent co-authors include Todd A. Anderson, George P. Cobb, John C. Zak, Michael R. Willig, Xiaoping Pan, Randall D. Wolcott, Scot E. Dowd, Verónica Acosta‐Martínez, John D. Hanson and Nancy E. McIntyre. Their work appears in journals such as Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Journal of Wound Care, Microbial Ecology, Chemosphere and Ecological Modelling.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact