Stephen Armstrong

645 citations
47 papers · 401 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen Armstrong

42 papers receiving 357 citations

Peers

Stephen Armstrong
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Health Informatics 12
  • Statistics and Probability 59
  • Health Information Management 29
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 74
  • Applied Psychology 24
Replace Anne L. Harvey with:
Anne L. Harvey United States
Russell W. Jones United States
Jacqueline Griffin United States
Zhehan Jiang United States
Polina Harik United States
Nicole Heitzmann Germany
Juan Carlos Guzmán United States
Olga Chernikova Germany
Vicki Bennett Australia
Stephen Armstrong relative to Anne L. Harvey United States Anne L. Harvey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Anne L. Harvey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Armstrong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Armstrong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Armstrong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Armstrong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Armstrong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Armstrong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Armstrong. The network helps show where Stephen Armstrong may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Armstrong, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Armstrong Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Armstrong links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200059
2 198251
3 198437
4 201725
5 201823
6 202018
7 201518
8 201615
9 199113
10 201711
11 201611
12 201810
13 201910
14 20208
15 20208
16 19998
17 20177
18 20236
19 20205
20 20205

About Stephen Armstrong

Stephen Armstrong is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Infectious Diseases, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Education, having authored 47 papers that have together received 401 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare Systems and Challenges (10 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (7 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (6 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (5 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (4 papers), SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (4 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (3 papers) and Behavioral and Psychological Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (12 citations), Statistics and Probability (59 citations), Health Information Management (29 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (74 citations) and Applied Psychology (24 citations). Stephen Armstrong has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include David R. Morse, Anind K. Dey, James M. Kauffman, David Thornton, Mario Sánchez Aguilar and Bob Algozzine. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ, Learning Disability Quarterly, TechTrends, Behavioral Disorders and The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact