Joseph Studer

122 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers

Joseph Studer
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
  • Applied Psychology 219
  • Clinical Psychology 564
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 40
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 261
  • Epidemiology 584
Replace Linda Richter with:
Linda Richter United States
Jens Christoffer Skogen Norway
Nathaniel R. Riggs United States
José Ramón Fernández Hermida Spain
Natalya C. Maisel United States
Joni Vander Bilt United States
Hayley A. Hamilton Canada
Elisardo Becoña Spain
Alexis Kuerbis United States
Cath E Chapman Australia
Joseph Studer relative to Linda Richter United States Linda Richter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×
Linda Richter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joseph Studer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joseph Studer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joseph Studer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joseph Studer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joseph Studer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joseph Studer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joseph Studer. The network helps show where Joseph Studer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Joseph Studer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joseph Studer Line = papers co-authored together Joseph Studer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 124 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012215
2 2013155
3 2015151
4 2018106
5 201589
6 201376
7 201667
8 201466
9 201463
10 201256
11 201355
12 201555
13 201252
14 201648
15 201347
16 201947
17 201343
18 201442
19 201438
20 201637

About Joseph Studer

Joseph Studer is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Pharmacology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 124 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (41 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (17 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (13 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (10 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (7 papers), Gambling Behavior and Treatments (6 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (5 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (219 citations), Clinical Psychology (564 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (40 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (261 citations) and Epidemiology (584 citations). Joseph Studer has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Gerhard E. Gmel, Stéphanie Baggio, Jean‐Bernard Daeppen, Meichun Mohler‐Kuo, Nicolas Bertholet, Stéphane Deline, Gisela Labouvie‐Vief, Anne-Laure Gilet, Simon Marmet and Daniel Grühn. Their work appears in journals such as Addiction, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Journal of Behavioral Addictions, PLoS ONE and Swiss Medical Weekly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact