Joseph Studer

119 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers

Joseph Studer
Comparison fields: 5 of 136
  • Applied Psychology 203
  • Clinical Psychology 530
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 37
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 244
  • Epidemiology 556
Replace Nathaniel R. Riggs with:
Nathaniel R. Riggs United States
Jens Christoffer Skogen Norway
Natalya C. Maisel United States
José Ramón Fernández Hermida Spain
Linda Richter United States
Joni Vander Bilt United States
Hayley A. Hamilton Canada
Sally E. Rooke Australia
Tony Jung Canada
Craig E. Henderson United States
Joseph Studer relative to Nathaniel R. Riggs United States Nathaniel R. Riggs's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Nathaniel R. Riggs · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joseph Studer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joseph Studer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joseph Studer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joseph Studer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joseph Studer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joseph Studer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joseph Studer. The network helps show where Joseph Studer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Joseph Studer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joseph Studer Line = papers co-authored together Joseph Studer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 121 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012207
2 2013152
3 2015143
4 2018101
5 201583
6 201373
7 201663
8 201460
9 201459
10 201554
11 201250
12 201250
13 201647
14 201347
15 201340
16 201939
17 201438
18 201438
19 201637
20 201935

About Joseph Studer

Joseph Studer is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Clinical Psychology, Pharmacology, Sociology and Political Science and Applied Psychology, having authored 121 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (40 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (17 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (13 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (10 papers), Gambling Behavior and Treatments (6 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (5 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (5 papers) and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (203 citations), Clinical Psychology (530 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (37 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (244 citations) and Epidemiology (556 citations). Joseph Studer has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Gerhard Gmel, Stéphanie Baggio, Jean‐Bernard Daeppen, Meichun Mohler‐Kuo, Nicolas Bertholet, Gisela Labouvie‐Vief, Anne-Laure Gilet, Simon Marmet, Stéphane Deline and Daniel Grühn. Their work appears in journals such as Addiction, PLoS ONE, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Journal of Behavioral Addictions and Swiss Medical Weekly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact