David Hawks

1.2k citations
64 papers · 875 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

David Hawks

58 papers receiving 673 citations

Peers

David Hawks
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Epidemiology 415
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 141
  • Clinical Psychology 155
  • Applied Psychology 31
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 102
Replace E. B. Ritson with:
E. B. Ritson United Kingdom
Martin Mitcheson United Kingdom
Robert B. Millman United States
Ira H. Cisin United States
Björn Hibell Sweden
Hamid Ghodse United Kingdom
Patrick R. Clifford United States
A T McLellan United States
Yvonne Bonomo Australia
Frederick Rotgers United States
David Hawks relative to E. B. Ritson United Kingdom E. B. Ritson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
E. B. Ritson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Hawks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Hawks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Hawks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Hawks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Hawks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Hawks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Hawks. The network helps show where David Hawks may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Hawks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Hawks Line = papers co-authored together David Hawks links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 196987
2 199672
3 197069
4 197466
5 199747
6 197542
7
PREVENTION OF PSYCHOACTIVE SUBSTANCE USE A Selected Review of What Works in the Area of Prevention
200340
8 197438
9 197034
10 199324
11 197419
12 199017
13 198916
14 199516
15 196415
16 199215
17 197115
18 199414
19 197113
20 197113

About David Hawks

David Hawks is a scholar working on Epidemiology, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 64 papers that have together received 875 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (26 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (10 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (9 papers), Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (9 papers), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (6 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (5 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (5 papers) and Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Epidemiology (415 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (141 citations), Clinical Psychology (155 citations), Applied Psychology (31 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (102 citations). David Hawks has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Tim Stockwell, Martin Mitcheson, R. W. Payne, E Lang, Alan C. Ogborne, Griffith Edwards, Simon Lenton, Eric Single, Jürgen Rehm and James S. Davidson. Their work appears in journals such as Drug and Alcohol Review, Addiction, The Medical Journal of Australia, The British Journal of Psychiatry and Contemporary Drug Problems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact