Sten Ternström

89 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Sten Ternström
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 529
  • Physiology 906
  • Music 119
  • Signal Processing 382
  • Speech and Hearing 175
Replace R.J. Baken with:
R.J. Baken United States
Adrian Fourcin United Kingdom
Svante Granqvist Sweden
Erkki Vilkman Finland
Elaine T. Stathopoulos United States
Maria Södersten Sweden
Martin Rothenberg United States
Anders Löfqvist United States
Evelyn Abberton United Kingdom
Britta Hammarberg Sweden
Sten Ternström relative to R.J. Baken United States R.J. Baken's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.7×
R.J. Baken · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sten Ternström

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sten Ternström's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sten Ternström with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sten Ternström more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sten Ternström

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sten Ternström. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sten Ternström. The network helps show where Sten Ternström may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sten Ternström, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sten Ternström Line = papers co-authored together Sten Ternström links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 91 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1988166
2 200484
3 198874
4 201069
5 200564
6 198656
7 200648
8 198843
9 199941
10
Choir acoustics : an overview of scientific research published to date
200339
11 198836
12 201335
13 201635
14 200933
15 198732
16 200930
17 201129
18 200227
19 199426
20 201426

About Sten Ternström

Sten Ternström is a scholar working on Physiology, Signal Processing, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 91 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Voice and Speech Disorders (45 papers), Music Technology and Sound Studies (27 papers), Speech Recognition and Synthesis (25 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (23 papers), Music and Audio Processing (23 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (23 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (9 papers) and Neuroscience and Music Perception (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (529 citations), Physiology (906 citations), Music (119 citations), Signal Processing (382 citations) and Speech and Hearing (175 citations). Sten Ternström has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Johan Sundberg, Maria Södersten, Christian T. Herbst, Patricia Gramming, William H. Perkins, Rolf Leanderson, Thomas D. Rossing, Anita McAllister, Åsa Nilsonne and Anders Askenfelt. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Voice, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology, Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research and SoftwareX.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact