Sten Ternström

81 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Sten Ternström
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 542
  • Physiology 918
  • Music 117
  • Signal Processing 394
  • Speech and Hearing 181
Replace Nathalie Henrich Bernardoni with:
Nathalie Henrich Bernardoni France
Svante Granqvist Sweden
Anne-Maria Laukkanen Finland
Ronald J. Baken United States
Adrian J. Fourcin United Kingdom
Erkki A. Vilkman Finland
Elaine T. Stathopoulos United States
Anders Löfqvist Sweden
Theresa A. Burnett United States
Valter Ciocca Hong Kong
Sten Ternström relative to Nathalie Henrich Bernardoni France Nathalie Henrich Bernardoni's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.5×
Nathalie Henrich Bernardoni · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sten Ternström

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sten Ternström's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sten Ternström with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sten Ternström more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sten Ternström

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sten Ternström. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sten Ternström. The network helps show where Sten Ternström may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sten Ternström, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sten Ternström Line = papers co-authored together Sten Ternström links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 83 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1988167
2 2015108
3 200482
4 198874
5 201068
6 200563
7 198654
8 200646
9 199942
10 198842
11
Choir acoustics : an overview of scientific research published to date
200339
12 201336
13 200935
14 198835
15 201634
16 198731
17 200931
18 201129
19 200227
20 199127

About Sten Ternström

Sten Ternström is a scholar working on Signal Processing, Physiology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Music, having authored 83 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Voice and Speech Disorders (40 papers), Music Technology and Sound Studies (27 papers), Music and Audio Processing (22 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (22 papers), Speech Recognition and Synthesis (21 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (19 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (8 papers) and Dysphagia Assessment and Management (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (542 citations), Physiology (918 citations), Music (117 citations), Signal Processing (394 citations) and Speech and Hearing (181 citations). Sten Ternström has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Johan Sundberg, Maria Södersten, Christian T. Herbst, Patricia Gramming, William Harvey Perkins, Rolf Leanderson, Thomas D. Rossing, Anita M. McAllister, Åsa Nilsonne and Anders G. Askenfelt. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Voice, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology, Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research and Applied Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact