Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology

652 papers and 8.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 652 papers published in Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology in the last decades have received a total of 8.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology usually cover Physiology (380 papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (254 papers) and Speech and Hearing (168 papers) specifically the topics of Voice and Speech Disorders (374 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (233 papers) and Dysphagia Assessment and Management (162 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology are Katherine Verdolini, Lorraine O. Ramig, Björn Fritzell, Johan Sundberg, Ingo R. Titze, Erkki Vilkman, Anne-Maria Laukkanen, Eric J. Hunter, Nathalie Henrich Bernardoni and Susanna Simberg.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology.

Countries where authors publish in Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025