Stefan Leis
Impact in
-
- Pain Management and Treatment
- Physiology top 10%
- Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Papers in
- Physiology 13
- Pain Mechanisms and Treatments 10
-
- Trigeminal Neuralgia and Treatments 5
- Spinal Cord Injury Research 4
- Co-authors
- Frank Birklein (10 shared papers)Martin Schmelz (8 shared papers)Margarete Weber (2 shared papers)Eugen Trinka (15 shared papers)Stefan Schultze–Mosgau (1 shared paper)Raffaele Nardone (6 shared papers)Aljoscha Thomschewski (8 shared papers)Yvonne Höller (7 shared papers)
- Journals
- Experimental Neurology (3 papers)Frontiers in Neurology (3 papers)Acta Neurologica Scandinavica (3 papers)Drug Discovery Today (2 papers)Frontiers in Neuroscience (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustriaGermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Stefan Leis
40 papers receiving 771 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 272
- Physiology 268
- Neurology 75
- Pharmacology 126
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 89
Countries citing papers authored by Stefan Leis
This map shows the geographic impact of Stefan Leis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stefan Leis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stefan Leis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stefan Leis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stefan Leis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stefan Leis. The network helps show where Stefan Leis may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stefan Leis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 98 | |
| 2 | 2003 | 98 | |
| 3 | 2004 | 68 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 60 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 44 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 37 | |
| 7 | 2003 | 35 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 32 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 27 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 26 | |
| 11 | 2004 | 22 | |
| 12 | 2004 | 21 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 21 | |
| 14 | 2009 | 19 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 18 | |
| 16 | 2023 | 17 | |
| 17 | 2017 | 17 | |
| 18 | 2007 | 15 | |
| 19 | 2006 | 13 | |
| 20 | 1999 | 11 |
About Stefan Leis
Stefan Leis is a scholar working on Physiology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Psychiatry and Mental health and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 45 papers that have together received 803 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (10 papers), Pain Management and Treatment (8 papers), Migraine and Headache Studies (6 papers), Trigeminal Neuralgia and Treatments (5 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (4 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (4 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (3 papers) and Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (272 citations), Physiology (268 citations), Neurology (75 citations), Pharmacology (126 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (89 citations). Stefan Leis has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Frank Birklein, Martin Schmelz, Margarete Weber, Eugen Trinka, Stefan Schultze–Mosgau, Raffaele Nardone, Aljoscha Thomschewski, Yvonne Höller, Stefan Golaszewski and Peter Höller. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental Neurology, Frontiers in Neurology, Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, Drug Discovery Today and Frontiers in Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.