Erwin Stolz

68 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Erwin Stolz
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 402
  • Health 151
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 24
  • Clinical Psychology 151
  • General Health Professions 141
Replace Karen M. van Leeuwen with:
Karen M. van Leeuwen Netherlands
Shihoko Koyama Japan
Angelica P. Herrera United States
Maureen A. Cava Canada
Darcy Jones McMaughan United States
Claire K. Ankuda United States
Gholamreza Ghaedamin Harouni Iran
Alberto Lana Spain
Luca Carra Italy
Rebecca J. Gorges United States
Erwin Stolz relative to Karen M. van Leeuwen Netherlands Karen M. van Leeuwen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.2×
Karen M. van Leeuwen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Erwin Stolz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Erwin Stolz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Erwin Stolz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erwin Stolz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Erwin Stolz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Erwin Stolz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Erwin Stolz. The network helps show where Erwin Stolz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Erwin Stolz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Erwin Stolz Line = papers co-authored together Erwin Stolz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 72 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2021108
2 2016102
3 2020101
4 202372
5 201954
6 202051
7 201748
8 201645
9 201643
10 202043
11 202140
12 202429
13 197928
14 202128
15 201524
16 202023
17 201721
18 202121
19 201520
20 201717

About Erwin Stolz

Erwin Stolz is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Health, Dermatology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Epidemiology, having authored 72 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Frailty in Older Adults (17 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (5 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (5 papers), Contact Dermatitis and Allergies (3 papers), Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments (3 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (3 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers) and COVID-19 and Mental Health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (402 citations), Health (151 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (24 citations), Clinical Psychology (151 citations) and General Health Professions (141 citations). Erwin Stolz has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Hannes Mayerl, Wolfgang Freidl, Éva Rásky, Emiel O. Hoogendijk, Thomas M. Gill, Regina Roller-Wirnsberger, Franziska Großschädl, Willibald Julius Stronegger, Richard C. Oude Voshaar and Hans W. Jeuring. Their work appears in journals such as The Journals of Gerontology Series A, Age and Ageing, PLoS ONE, European Journal of Public Health and Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact