Acta Neurologica Scandinavica

8.5k papers and 201.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 8.5k papers published in Acta Neurologica Scandinavica in the last decades have received a total of 201.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Acta Neurologica Scandinavica usually cover Neurology (3.1k papers), Psychiatry and Mental health (1.8k papers) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.5k papers) specifically the topics of Epilepsy research and treatment (1.1k papers), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (906 papers) and Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (831 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Acta Neurologica Scandinavica are John F. Kurtzke, U. K. Rinne, Barbro B. Johansson, Nils Henrik Diemer, David H. Ingvar, Josef Finsterer, Jan Larsen, Torbjorn Bäckström, Barry Halliwell and Michael Kjær.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Acta Neurologica Scandinavica

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Acta Neurologica Scandinavica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Acta Neurologica Scandinavica.

Countries where authors publish in Acta Neurologica Scandinavica

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Acta Neurologica Scandinavica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Acta Neurologica Scandinavica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Acta Neurologica Scandinavica more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025