Stan Shapson

30 papers receiving 425 citations

Peers

Stan Shapson
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Linguistics and Language 176
  • Language and Linguistics 313
  • Literature and Literary Theory 263
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 172
  • Education 197
Replace Hywel Coleman with:
Hywel Coleman United Kingdom
Steven McDonough South Korea
Dale L. Lange United States
Rita Elaine Silver Singapore
Kris Van den Branden Belgium
Megan Madigan Peercy United States
Anwei Feng United Kingdom
Ahmar Mahboob Australia
Alan V. Brown United States
Joaquim Dolz Switzerland
Stan Shapson relative to Hywel Coleman United Kingdom Hywel Coleman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Hywel Coleman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stan Shapson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stan Shapson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stan Shapson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stan Shapson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stan Shapson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stan Shapson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stan Shapson. The network helps show where Stan Shapson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Stan Shapson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stan Shapson Line = papers co-authored together Stan Shapson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991134
2 198094
3 199078
4 200948
5 199829
6 199628
7 198522
8 200118
9 198717
10 199612
11 198210
12 19879
13 19938
14
Transformative Teaching: An Agenda for Faculties of Education.
19997
15 19787
16 19887
17 19806
18
Secondary French Immersion: A Study of Students Who Leave the Program.
19895
19 19785
20 19905

About Stan Shapson

Stan Shapson is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Language and Linguistics, Linguistics and Language, Education and Information Systems, having authored 34 papers that have together received 578 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Second Language Learning and Teaching (16 papers), EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (15 papers), Multilingual Education and Policy (9 papers), French Language Learning Methods (5 papers), Educational Practices and Policies (2 papers), Adult and Continuing Education Topics (1 paper), Educational Research and Pedagogy (1 paper) and Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Linguistics and Language (176 citations), Language and Linguistics (313 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (263 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (172 citations) and Education (197 citations). Stan Shapson has collaborated with scholars based in Canada. Frequent co-authors include Elaine Day, Merrill Swain, Sharon Lapkin, John Fitzgerald, David Phipps, David Kaufman, Ellen Bialystok, Birgit Harley, Alison d’Anglejan and John Fitzgerald. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Modern Language Review/ La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, Language Learning, Modern Language Journal and American Educational Research Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact