Stacey D. Smith

4.1k citations
78 papers · 2.9k · h-index 28

Impact in

Papers in

Stacey D. Smith

74 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Peers

Stacey D. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.5k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 406
  • Paleontology 237
  • History and Philosophy of Science 121
  • Ecological Modeling 101
Replace Chelsea D. Specht with:
Chelsea D. Specht United States
John Trueman Australia
Melissa Luckow United States
Thomas R. Meagher United States
Benoît Pujol France
Paul M. Beardsley United States
Verne Grant United States
Hugh D. Loxdale United Kingdom
Nicolas Galtier France
Marjorie G. Weber United States
Stacey D. Smith relative to Chelsea D. Specht United States Chelsea D. Specht's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11×
Chelsea D. Specht · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stacey D. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stacey D. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stacey D. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stacey D. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stacey D. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stacey D. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stacey D. Smith. The network helps show where Stacey D. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stacey D. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stacey D. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Stacey D. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 78 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006389
2 2016237
3 2005231
4 2008138
5 2011109
6 2014105
7 2009101
8 200685
9 201082
10 201579
11 201071
12 201769
13 201466
14 201666
15 201265
16 201262
17 201152
18 201751
19 201549
20 201043

About Stacey D. Smith

Stacey D. Smith is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Genetics and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 78 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (38 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (18 papers), Plant Gene Expression Analysis (17 papers), Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (12 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (11 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (9 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (8 papers) and Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.5k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (406 citations), Paleontology (237 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (121 citations) and Ecological Modeling (101 citations). Stacey D. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Argentina. Frequent co-authors include David Baum, Mark D. Rausher, Cécile Ané, Julienne Ng, Antonis Rokas, Sam S Donovan, Marc T. J. Johnson, Julia Dupin, Lynn Bohs and Richard G. Olmstead. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Botany, Evolution, Molecular Biology and Evolution, New Phytologist and Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact