Amy Litt
Impact in
- Plant Science top 1%
- Plant Molecular Biology Research
-
- Plant Diversity and Evolution
- Plant and animal studies
Papers in
-
- Plant Reproductive Biology 17
- Plant Gene Expression Analysis 9
- Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions 6
-
- Plant Molecular Biology Research 15
- Plant Parasitism and Resistance 4
- Co-authors
- Vivian F. Irish (5 shared papers)Natalia Pabón‐Mora (5 shared papers)Elena M. Kramer (2 shared papers)Kenneth J. Sytsma (4 shared papers)Elena Conti (4 shared papers)Rachel S. Meyer (8 shared papers)Lena C. Hileman (3 shared papers)Edward J. Kennelly (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- American Journal of Botany (8 papers)Frontiers in Plant Science (5 papers)The Plant Journal (2 papers)BMC Genomics (2 papers)Systematic Botany (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Amy Litt
52 papers receiving 2.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Plant Science 1.9k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 840
- Molecular Biology 1.8k
- Horticulture 16
- Biochemistry 79
Countries citing papers authored by Amy Litt
This map shows the geographic impact of Amy Litt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy Litt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy Litt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amy Litt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy Litt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy Litt. The network helps show where Amy Litt may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amy Litt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 321 | |
| 2 | 2004 | 182 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 161 | |
| 4 | 2005 | 157 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 136 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 132 | |
| 7 | 1996 | 122 | |
| 8 | 2006 | 122 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 108 | |
| 10 | 2004 | 108 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 100 | |
| 12 | 1997 | 99 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 95 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 94 | |
| 15 | 2011 | 74 | |
| 16 | 2016 | 66 | |
| 17 | 2013 | 62 | |
| 18 | 2011 | 61 | |
| 19 | 2015 | 51 | |
| 20 | 1996 | 45 |
About Amy Litt
Amy Litt is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Cell Biology and Genetics, having authored 52 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Reproductive Biology (17 papers), Plant Molecular Biology Research (15 papers), Plant and animal studies (13 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (12 papers), Plant Gene Expression Analysis (9 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (7 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (6 papers) and Plant Parasitism and Resistance (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (1.9k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (840 citations), Molecular Biology (1.8k citations), Horticulture (16 citations) and Biochemistry (79 citations). Amy Litt has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Vivian F. Irish, Natalia Pabón‐Mora, Elena M. Kramer, Kenneth J. Sytsma, Elena Conti, Rachel S. Meyer, Lena C. Hileman, Edward J. Kennelly, Barbara A. Ambrose and Peter G. Wilson. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Botany, Frontiers in Plant Science, The Plant Journal, BMC Genomics and Systematic Botany.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.