Simone McCarthy

43 papers receiving 582 citations

Peers

Simone McCarthy
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Clinical Psychology 322
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 94
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 32
  • General Health Professions 39
  • Gender Studies 18
Replace Hannah Pitt with:
Hannah Pitt Australia
Grace Arnot Australia
Simon Chapman Australia
Matthew Philpott United Kingdom
Angela Rintoul Australia
Johanna Gripenberg Sweden
I Gede Juanamasta Thailand
Barbara M. Wilson Canada
Marina Beléndez Vázquez Spain
Krzysztof Jurek Poland
Simone McCarthy relative to Hannah Pitt Australia Hannah Pitt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Hannah Pitt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Simone McCarthy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Simone McCarthy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Simone McCarthy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Simone McCarthy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Simone McCarthy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Simone McCarthy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Simone McCarthy. The network helps show where Simone McCarthy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Simone McCarthy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Simone McCarthy Line = papers co-authored together Simone McCarthy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201863
2 201857
3 201954
4 202336
5 202029
6 202429
7 202324
8 202324
9 202424
10 202220
11 202320
12 202119
13 202318
14 202317
15 202416
16 202114
17 202514
18 202311
19 20229
20 20249

About Simone McCarthy

Simone McCarthy is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Marketing and Gender Studies, having authored 46 papers that have together received 591 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gambling Behavior and Treatments (21 papers), Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology (13 papers), Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments (4 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (3 papers), Sports, Gender, and Society (3 papers), Climate Change Communication and Perception (3 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (3 papers) and Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (322 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (94 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (32 citations), General Health Professions (39 citations) and Gender Studies (18 citations). Simone McCarthy has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Samantha L. Thomas, Hannah Pitt, Mike Daube, Grace Arnot, Rebecca Cassidy, Maria Bellringer, Melanie Randle, Sean Cowlishaw, Amy Bestman and Marita Hennessy. Their work appears in journals such as Health Promotion International, BMC Public Health, Health Promotion Journal of Australia, Harm Reduction Journal and Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact