Simon Emmerson

884 citations
29 papers · 294 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Simon Emmerson

26 papers receiving 214 citations

Peers

Simon Emmerson
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Music 123
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 224
  • Signal Processing 75
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 116
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 24
Replace Trevor Wishart with:
Trevor Wishart United Kingdom
Leigh Landy United Kingdom
Denis Smalley United Kingdom
Agostino Di Scipio Italy
Arnie Cox United States
Pierre Boulez France
Don Michael Randel United States
Benjamin Boretz United States
Nicolas Donin France
Christopher Hasty United States
Simon Emmerson relative to Trevor Wishart United Kingdom Trevor Wishart's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Trevor Wishart · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Simon Emmerson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Simon Emmerson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Simon Emmerson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Simon Emmerson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Simon Emmerson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Simon Emmerson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Simon Emmerson. The network helps show where Simon Emmerson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Simon Emmerson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Simon Emmerson Line = papers co-authored together Simon Emmerson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198785
2 200247
3 199827
4 198916
5 199813
6 200612
7 201812
8
'Local/field': towards a typology of live electroacoustic music
199411
9 201710
10 199410
11 20168
12 20166
13 19916
14 20015
15
Computers and Live Electronic Music: Some Solutions, Many Problems
19913
16
Music, mind and structure
19893
17 20013
18 20113
19 20163
20
'Where next? New music, new musicology'
20072

About Simon Emmerson

Simon Emmerson is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Music, Cognitive Neuroscience, Signal Processing and Communication, having authored 29 papers that have together received 294 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Music Technology and Sound Studies (19 papers), Diverse Musicological Studies (4 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (4 papers), Musicology and Musical Analysis (4 papers), Music and Audio Processing (4 papers), Diverse Music Education Insights (3 papers), Music History and Culture (2 papers) and Media, Communication, and Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Music (123 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (224 citations), Signal Processing (75 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (116 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (24 citations). Simon Emmerson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Eric Clarke, Denis Smalley, Gary S. Kendall, Michael Young, John Young, Leigh Landy and Andrew Hugill. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Music Review, Organised Sound, Computer Music Journal, Journal of New Music Research and International Review of the Aesthetics and Sociology of Music.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact