Michael Young

2.1k citations
87 papers · 1.6k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Young

83 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Michael Young
Comparison fields: 5 of 158
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 88
  • Cell Biology 263
  • Clinical Psychology 250
  • General Health Professions 283
  • Applied Psychology 44
Replace Daniel R. Brooks with:
Daniel R. Brooks United States
Hein Stigum Norway
Hongjie Liu China
Steven J. Samuels United States
Jean G. Ford United States
Neil Campbell United Kingdom
Gregory S. Andérson Canada
Cecilia Høst Ramlau‐Hansen Denmark
Niels Henrik Hjøllund Denmark
Katie M. O’Brien United States
Michael Young relative to Daniel R. Brooks United States Daniel R. Brooks's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Daniel R. Brooks · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Young

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Young's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Young with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Young more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Young

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Young. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Young. The network helps show where Michael Young may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Young, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Young Line = papers co-authored together Michael Young links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 87 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003161
2 2002112
3 200491
4 199967
5 200656
6 200454
7 199151
8 201249
9 200048
10 200047
11 201145
12 198943
13 200543
14 200742
15 199841
16 201337
17 201936
18 195235
19 199430
20 201330

About Michael Young

Michael Young is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Infectious Diseases, having authored 87 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (19 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (7 papers), Radioactivity and Radon Measurements (6 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (6 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (6 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (5 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (5 papers) and Geophysical Methods and Applications (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (88 citations), Cell Biology (263 citations), Clinical Psychology (250 citations), General Health Professions (283 citations) and Applied Psychology (44 citations). Michael Young has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include John A. Cooper, George Denny, Tina M. Penhollow, Wei‐Lih Lee, Alissa M. Weaver, Paul C. Bridgman, Chudley E. Werch, Kenneth Keegstra, John E. Froehlich and Ulrich Ofterdinger. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of School Health, Journal of Drug Education, American Journal of Health Behavior, Applied Nursing Research and Health & Social Work.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact