International Review of the Aesthetics and Sociology of Music

2.0k citations
377 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

  • Music 179
    • Musicology and Musical Analysis 124
    • Diverse Musicological Studies 70
    • Music History and Culture 44
    • Diverse Music Education Insights 15

International Review of the Aesthetics and Sociology of Music

184 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

International Review of the Aesthetics and Sociology of Music
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Music 937
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 168
  • Urban Studies 202
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 350
  • Classics 76
Replace Journal of the Royal Musical Association with:
Journal of the Royal Musical Association United Kingdom
Musicology Australia Australia
Ethnomusicology Forum United Kingdom
twentieth-century music United States
Asian Music United States
Dance Research United Kingdom
Journal of Musicological Research United States
Black Music Research Journal United States
Latin American Music Review United States
Journal of Popular Music Studies United States
International Review of the Aesthetics and Sociology of Music relative to Journal of the Royal Musical Association United Kingdom Journal of the Royal Musical Association's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Journal of the Royal Musical Association · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in International Review of the Aesthetics and Sociology of Music

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Review of the Aesthetics and Sociology of Music. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Review of the Aesthetics and Sociology of Music with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Review of the Aesthetics and Sociology of Music more than expected).

Fields of papers published in International Review of the Aesthetics and Sociology of Music

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in International Review of the Aesthetics and Sociology of Music. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Review of the Aesthetics and Sociology of Music.

About International Review of the Aesthetics and Sociology of Music

The 377 papers published in International Review of the Aesthetics and Sociology of Music in the last decades have received a total of 2.0k indexed citations . Papers published in International Review of the Aesthetics and Sociology of Music usually cover Music (179 papers), General Arts and Humanities (9 papers), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (19 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (40 papers) and Anthropology (34 papers) specifically the topics of Musicology and Musical Analysis (124 papers), Diverse Musicological Studies (70 papers), Music History and Culture (44 papers), Music Technology and Sound Studies (29 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (28 papers), Historical Influence and Diplomacy (25 papers), Arts, Culture, and Music Studies (16 papers) and Diverse Music Education Insights (15 papers). The most active scholars publishing in International Review of the Aesthetics and Sociology of Music are William J. Baumöl, William G. Bowen, Jean-Jacques Nattiez, Antoni Pizà, Carolyn Abbate, Ivo Supičić, William Weber, Peregrine Horden, George H. Lewis and Robin Moore.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact