Computer Music Journal

1.1k papers and 16.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.1k papers published in Computer Music Journal in the last decades have received a total of 16.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Computer Music Journal usually cover Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (828 papers), Signal Processing (595 papers) and Cognitive Neuroscience (292 papers) specifically the topics of Music Technology and Sound Studies (808 papers), Music and Audio Processing (564 papers) and Neuroscience and Music Perception (244 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Computer Music Journal are Ray Jackendoff, Fred Lerdahl, Peter Child, Julius O. Smith, David Wessel, Curtis Roads, Durand R. Begault, Stephen W. Smoliar, Barry Truax and Anders Friberg.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Computer Music Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Computer Music Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Computer Music Journal.

Countries where authors publish in Computer Music Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Computer Music Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Computer Music Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Computer Music Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025