Sharon Lockyer

1000 citations
29 papers · 466 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Sharon Lockyer

26 papers receiving 404 citations

Peers

Sharon Lockyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Gender Studies 151
  • Social Psychology 262
  • Literature and Literary Theory 145
  • Communication 56
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 32
Replace Mahadev L. Apte with:
Mahadev L. Apte United States
Katrin Döveling Germany
Susan Sniader Lanser United States
Victor Burgin United Kingdom
Deanna L. Fassett United States
Betty R. McGraw United States
Jack G. Shaheen United States
Stephen Michael Best
Joshua Gunn United States
Krista Ratcliffe United States
Sharon Lockyer relative to Mahadev L. Apte United States Mahadev L. Apte's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.5×
Mahadev L. Apte · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sharon Lockyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sharon Lockyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sharon Lockyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sharon Lockyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sharon Lockyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sharon Lockyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sharon Lockyer. The network helps show where Sharon Lockyer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Sharon Lockyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sharon Lockyer Line = papers co-authored together Sharon Lockyer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005108
2 2008100
3 200139
4 200537
5 201035
6 201918
7 200617
8 201517
9 201116
10 200616
11 200611
12 202110
13 20056
14 20156
15 20095
16 20154
17 20164
18 20123
19 20233
20 20192

About Sharon Lockyer

Sharon Lockyer is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Social Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory, Communication and Visual Arts and Performing Arts, having authored 29 papers that have together received 466 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Humor Studies and Applications (10 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (8 papers), Media Studies and Communication (4 papers), Media, Gender, and Advertising (4 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (3 papers), Narrative Theory and Analysis (2 papers), Comics and Graphic Narratives (2 papers) and Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (151 citations), Social Psychology (262 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (145 citations), Communication (56 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (32 citations). Sharon Lockyer has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Romania and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Michael Pickering, Heather Savigny, Simon Weaver, Simon S. Cross, Feona Attwood, Sara De Benedictis, Milly Williamson and Oliver Double. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Social Research Methodology, Journalism Studies, Discourse & Society, International journal of communication and Comedy Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact