Sharon Lockyer

990 citations
25 papers · 334 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Sharon Lockyer

22 papers receiving 300 citations

Peers

Sharon Lockyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Gender Studies 114
  • Social Psychology 209
  • Literature and Literary Theory 94
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 29
  • Communication 40
Replace H. E. Baber with:
H. E. Baber United States
Deanna L. Fassett United States
Theresa Rogers Canada
Krista Ratcliffe United States
Kristyn Gorton United Kingdom
Sandra Weber Canada
Susan S. Lanser United States
Louise Mullany United Kingdom
Suzette Haden Elgin United States
Robert Eaglestone United Kingdom
Sharon Lockyer relative to H. E. Baber United States H. E. Baber's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12.3×
H. E. Baber · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sharon Lockyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sharon Lockyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sharon Lockyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sharon Lockyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sharon Lockyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sharon Lockyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sharon Lockyer. The network helps show where Sharon Lockyer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Sharon Lockyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sharon Lockyer Line = papers co-authored together Sharon Lockyer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200891
2 200562
3 200134
4 201023
5 201916
6 200615
7 200614
8 201512
9 201111
10 200611
11 20219
12 20117
13 20155
14 20094
15 20163
16 20153
17 20233
18
Screening the Undead: Vampires and Zombies in Film and Television
20133
19 20123
20
Hearing voices: mental illness and cultural recognition
20021

About Sharon Lockyer

Sharon Lockyer is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory, Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science and Communication, having authored 25 papers that have together received 334 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Humor Studies and Applications (10 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (7 papers), Media, Gender, and Advertising (4 papers), Media Studies and Communication (3 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (2 papers), Media Influence and Health (2 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (2 papers) and Narrative Theory and Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (114 citations), Social Psychology (209 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (94 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (29 citations) and Communication (40 citations). Sharon Lockyer has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Romania and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Michael Pickering, Heather Savigny, Simon S. Cross, Simon Weaver, Feona Attwood, Sara De Benedictis, Brett Mills, Louise Peacock, Milly Williamson and Oliver Double. Their work appears in journals such as Comedy Studies, Popular Communication, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, Journalism Studies and Critical Studies in Television The International Journal of Television Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact