H. E. Baber

753 citations
26 papers · 460 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

H. E. Baber

20 papers receiving 365 citations

Peers

H. E. Baber
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Social Psychology 261
  • Literature and Literary Theory 111
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 100
  • Philosophy 87
  • Gender Studies 66
Replace Mahadev L. Apte with:
Mahadev L. Apte United States
Sharon Lockyer United Kingdom
Sara Heinämaa Finland
Katrin Döveling Germany
Uri Margolin United States
Alleen Pace Nilsen United States
Krista Ratcliffe United States
Honi Fern Haber United States
Paul Magee Australia
Lambert Deckers United States
H. E. Baber relative to Mahadev L. Apte United States Mahadev L. Apte's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
Mahadev L. Apte · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by H. E. Baber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. E. Baber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. E. Baber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. E. Baber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. E. Baber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. E. Baber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. E. Baber. The network helps show where H. E. Baber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside H. E. Baber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with H. E. Baber Line = papers co-authored together H. E. Baber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1984351
2 200735
3 20128
4 19877
5 19867
6 20107
7 20097
8 20125
9
The multicultural mystique : the liberal case against diversity
20084
10 19944
11 20154
12 20173
13 20083
14 20162
15
The multicultural mystique
20082
16 20102
17 20112
18 20022
19 19901
20 20001

About H. E. Baber

H. E. Baber is a scholar working on Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Political Science and International Relations and Social Psychology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 460 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Theology and Philosophy of Evil (5 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (4 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (3 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (2 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (2 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (2 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (1 paper) and Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (261 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (111 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (100 citations), Philosophy (87 citations) and Gender Studies (66 citations). H. E. Baber has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include John Donnelly and John Morreall. Their work appears in journals such as Religious Studies, Sophia, Philosophia, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research and The Monist.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact