H. E. Baber
Impact in
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Humor Studies and Applications
- Communication in Education and Healthcare
-
- Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
- Media Influence and Health
Papers in
-
- Religion and Society Interactions 2
- Religion, Society, and Development 1
-
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil 3
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 2
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 2
- Medieval and Classical Philosophy 1
- Journals
- Religious Studies (3 papers)Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (2 papers)Sophia (2 papers)The Monist (2 papers)Philosophia (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
H. E. Baber
17 papers receiving 308 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Social Psychology 230
- Literature and Literary Theory 99
- Philosophy 76
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 87
- Gender Studies 58
Countries citing papers authored by H. E. Baber
This map shows the geographic impact of H. E. Baber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. E. Baber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. E. Baber more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by H. E. Baber
This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. E. Baber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. E. Baber. The network helps show where H. E. Baber may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside H. E. Baber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1984 | 310 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 28 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 7 | |
| 4 | 1986 | 6 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 6 | |
| 6 | 1987 | 6 | |
| 7 | The multicultural mystique : the liberal case against diversity | 2008 | 4 |
| 8 | 2015 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 4 | |
| 10 | 1994 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2008 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 2 | |
| 13 | The multicultural mystique | 2008 | 2 |
| 14 | 2002 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1992 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2000 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2004 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2024 | 0 |
About H. E. Baber
H. E. Baber is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Political Science and International Relations and Social Psychology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 393 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (4 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (3 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (2 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (2 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (2 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (2 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (1 paper) and Medieval and Classical Philosophy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (230 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (99 citations), Philosophy (76 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (87 citations) and Gender Studies (58 citations). H. E. Baber has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include John Donnelly and John Morreall. Their work appears in journals such as Religious Studies, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Sophia, The Monist and Philosophia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.