Scott Noggle
Impact in
- Developmental Neuroscience top 1%
- Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Aging top 1%
Papers in
-
- Pluripotent Stem Cells Research 34
- CRISPR and Genetic Engineering 24
-
- Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms 5
- Co-authors
- Andrew A. Sproul (13 shared papers)Samson Jacob (9 shared papers)Brian G. Condie (6 shared papers)Dominik Paquet (3 shared papers)Matthew Zimmer (10 shared papers)Shaun Teo (1 shared paper)Marc Tessier‐Lavigne (2 shared papers)Dylan Kwart (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Stem Cells (5 papers)Cell stem cell (4 papers)Nature (3 papers)Stem Cell Research (3 papers)Nature Neuroscience (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSpainIndia
In The Last Decade
Scott Noggle
71 papers receiving 5.5k citations
Scott Noggle's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
- Developmental Neuroscience 515
- Aging 217
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.1k
- Molecular Biology 3.9k
- Neurology 450
Countries citing papers authored by Scott Noggle
This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Noggle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Noggle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Noggle more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Noggle
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Noggle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Noggle. The network helps show where Scott Noggle may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott Noggle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 72 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Efficient introduction of specific homozygous and heterozygous mutations using CRISPR/Cas9 Hit paper breakdown → | 2016 | 719 |
| 2 | 2016 | 370 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 362 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 292 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 217 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 209 | |
| 7 | 2003 | 201 | |
| 8 | 2004 | 199 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 191 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 187 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 186 | |
| 12 | 2005 | 165 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 160 | |
| 14 | 2014 | 151 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 135 | |
| 16 | 2020 | 132 | |
| 17 | 2006 | 129 | |
| 18 | 2003 | 123 | |
| 19 | 2016 | 120 | |
| 20 | 2003 | 112 |
About Scott Noggle
Scott Noggle is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Developmental Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Physiology and Aging, having authored 72 papers that have together received 5.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (34 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (24 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (9 papers), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (8 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (6 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (5 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (5 papers) and Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (515 citations), Aging (217 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.1k citations), Molecular Biology (3.9k citations) and Neurology (450 citations). Scott Noggle has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Spain and India. Frequent co-authors include Andrew A. Sproul, Samson Jacob, Brian G. Condie, Dominik Paquet, Matthew Zimmer, Shaun Teo, Marc Tessier‐Lavigne, Dylan Kwart, Andrew Gregg and Maisam M. Mitalipova. Their work appears in journals such as Stem Cells, Cell stem cell, Nature, Stem Cell Research and Nature Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.