Scott M. Debb

662 citations
25 papers · 462 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Scott M. Debb

23 papers receiving 438 citations

Peers

Scott M. Debb
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Health 151
  • Applied Psychology 50
  • Clinical Psychology 136
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 113
  • Social Psychology 73
Replace Maria Caiata Zufferey with:
Maria Caiata Zufferey Switzerland
Sehar-un-Nisa Hassan Saudi Arabia
Jovana Todorović Serbia
Jean O Taylor United States
Andrew Darley Ireland
Trung Thanh Nguyen Vietnam
Stephen Wai Hang Kwok Australia
Joanna Ting Wai Chu New Zealand
Patricia Chalela United States
Dannielle Kelley United States
Scott M. Debb relative to Maria Caiata Zufferey Switzerland Maria Caiata Zufferey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Maria Caiata Zufferey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott M. Debb

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott M. Debb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott M. Debb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott M. Debb more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott M. Debb

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott M. Debb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott M. Debb. The network helps show where Scott M. Debb may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Scott M. Debb, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott M. Debb Line = papers co-authored together Scott M. Debb links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011226
2 200857
3 201944
4 202023
5 201918
6 202113
7 201012
8 201311
9 202010
10 20169
11 20179
12 20195
13 20185
14 20224
15 20094
16 20203
17 20212
18 20092
19
Reengineering Introductory Psychology for the Virtual Classroom: Qualitative Report on Initial Course Design and Preliminary Student Feedback
20141
20 20161

About Scott M. Debb

Scott M. Debb is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Education, Clinical Psychology and Information Systems, having authored 25 papers that have together received 462 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Impact of Technology on Adolescents (4 papers), Information and Cyber Security (4 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (3 papers), Social Media and Politics (2 papers), Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation (2 papers), Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (2 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (2 papers) and Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (151 citations), Applied Psychology (50 citations), Clinical Psychology (136 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (113 citations) and Social Psychology (73 citations). Scott M. Debb has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include David Cella, Benjamin Arnold, Jason Bredle, John M. Salsman, Daniel Schaffer, David L. Blitz, Seung W. Choi, Deepa Rao, David Victorson and Cindy J. Nowinski. Their work appears in journals such as Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking, Value in Health, Mindfulness, Psycho-Oncology and Journal of Black Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact