Daniel Schaffer
Impact in
- Public Administration top 10%
- Social Work Education and Practice
- Urban Studies top 5%
- Urban Planning and Governance
- Urbanization and City Planning
Papers in
-
- American Environmental and Regional History 4
-
- Impact of Technology on Adolescents 3
- Privacy, Security, and Data Protection 2
- Co-authors
- Robert J. Fisher (1 shared paper)Scott M. Debb (4 shared papers)David A. Johnson (1 shared paper)Hamid Okhravi (1 shared paper)Serina A. Neumann (1 shared paper)Guanghua Wang (1 shared paper)Nancy Dow (1 shared paper)Aaron Auerbach (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of American History (2 papers)Journal of the American Planning Association (2 papers)The American Historical Review (2 papers)Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking (2 papers)Planning Perspectives (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Daniel Schaffer
16 papers receiving 248 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Public Administration 40
- Urban Studies 45
- Sociology and Political Science 128
- General Health Professions 66
- Finance 23
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Schaffer
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Schaffer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Schaffer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Schaffer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Schaffer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Schaffer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Schaffer. The network helps show where Daniel Schaffer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 14 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Schaffer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1985 | 169 | |
| 2 | 1989 | 29 | |
| 3 | 1983 | 28 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 23 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 12 | |
| 6 | 2008 | 11 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 10 | |
| 8 | 1985 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 5 | |
| 10 | 1986 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 12 | 1983 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1990 | 2 | |
| 14 | 1990 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1998 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2007 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1989 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2020 | 0 | |
| 19 | 2015 | 0 |
About Daniel Schaffer
Daniel Schaffer is a scholar working on Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology, Education and Surgery, having authored 19 papers that have together received 311 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Environmental and Regional History (4 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (3 papers), Archaeology and Natural History (2 papers), Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (2 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (2 papers), Social Media and Politics (1 paper), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper) and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (40 citations), Urban Studies (45 citations), Sociology and Political Science (128 citations), General Health Professions (66 citations) and Finance (23 citations). Daniel Schaffer has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert J. Fisher, Scott M. Debb, David A. Johnson, Hamid Okhravi, Serina A. Neumann, Guanghua Wang, Nancy Dow, Aaron Auerbach, Todd Barry and Nadine S. Aguilera. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of American History, Journal of the American Planning Association, The American Historical Review, Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking and Planning Perspectives.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.