Daniel Schaffer

17 papers receiving 256 citations

Peers

Daniel Schaffer
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Urban Studies 78
  • Public Administration 26
  • Architecture 16
  • General Social Sciences 13
  • General Health Professions 49
Replace Nicola Brackertz with:
Nicola Brackertz Australia
Peter King United Kingdom
Luca Pattaroni Switzerland
Howard Gillette United States
Sue Goss
Jordi Borja i Sebastià
Denis Killeen
Herbert J. Schubert Germany
Robert Imrie United Kingdom
Jordi Borja Spain
Daniel Schaffer relative to Nicola Brackertz Australia Nicola Brackertz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.6×
Nicola Brackertz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Schaffer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Schaffer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Schaffer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Schaffer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Schaffer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Schaffer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Schaffer. The network helps show where Daniel Schaffer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Schaffer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Schaffer Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Schaffer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1985162
2 198932
3 202029
4 198327
5 200814
6 202012
7 202012
8 19859
9 19865
10 20195
11 19832
12 19902
13 20072
14 19891
15 19901
16 19981
17 20071
18 20071
19 20201
20 19960

About Daniel Schaffer

Daniel Schaffer is a scholar working on Urban Studies, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Geography, Planning and Development, Information Systems and Management and Architecture, having authored 21 papers that have together received 319 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Urban Planning and Governance (5 papers), American Environmental and Regional History (5 papers), Research, Science, and Academia (3 papers), Science, Technology, and Education in Latin America (2 papers), Science and Science Education (2 papers), Local Governance and Planning (2 papers), International Science and Diplomacy (2 papers) and Information and Cyber Security (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (78 citations), Public Administration (26 citations), Architecture (16 citations), General Social Sciences (13 citations) and General Health Professions (49 citations). Daniel Schaffer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Scott M. Debb, David A. Johnson, Hamid Reza Okhravi, Serina A. Neumann, Nancy S. Dow, Aaron Auerbach, Guanghua Wang, Todd S. Barry, Nadine S. Ives Aguilera and Leslie H. Sobin. Their work appears in journals such as Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking, Journal of the American Planning Association, The American Historical Review, Journal of American History and Planning Perspectives.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact