Autonomous Robots

1.5k papers and 52.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.5k papers published in Autonomous Robots in the last decades have received a total of 52.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Autonomous Robots usually cover Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (683 papers), Aerospace Engineering (521 papers) and Control and Systems Engineering (513 papers) specifically the topics of Robotic Path Planning Algorithms (463 papers), Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization (431 papers) and Robot Manipulation and Learning (286 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Autonomous Robots are Sebastian Thrun, Wolfram Burgard, Maja J. Matarić, Evangelos Milios, J. Yuh, Cyrill Stachniss, M. Anthony Lewis, Feng Lu, Sanjiv Singh and Roland Siegwart.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Autonomous Robots

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Autonomous Robots. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Autonomous Robots.

Countries where authors publish in Autonomous Robots

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Autonomous Robots. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Autonomous Robots with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Autonomous Robots more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025