Scott Grimm

3.3k citations
56 papers · 1.6k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Scott Grimm

55 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Scott Grimm
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Pharmacology 592
  • Language and Linguistics 303
  • Linguistics and Language 103
  • Oncology 381
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 131
Replace Myron Weiner with:
Myron Weiner United States
Mark W. Linder United States
Donghui Cui United States
Sarah C. Sim Sweden
Todd A. Gillespie United States
David J. Greenblatt United States
Brian Granda United States
Cuiping Chen United States
L. P. Balant Switzerland
Jinping Gan United States
Scott Grimm relative to Myron Weiner United States Myron Weiner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×50×103×
Myron Weiner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Grimm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Grimm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Grimm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Grimm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Grimm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Grimm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Grimm. The network helps show where Scott Grimm may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott Grimm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott Grimm Line = papers co-authored together Scott Grimm links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009245
2 2006149
3 2005119
4 2010117
5 199188
6 201175
7
Inhibition of human drug metabolizing cytochromes P450 by anastrozole, a potent and selective inhibitor of aromatase.
199761
8 200659
9 200256
10 201846
11 201043
12 201239
13 202133
14 199733
15 201932
16 201822
17 201822
18 201521
19 201020
20 199318

About Scott Grimm

Scott Grimm is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Artificial Intelligence, Pharmacology, Molecular Biology and Pharmacology, having authored 56 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (19 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (17 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (12 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (7 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (5 papers), Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology (4 papers), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (4 papers) and Language and cultural evolution (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (592 citations), Language and Linguistics (303 citations), Linguistics and Language (103 citations), Oncology (381 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (131 citations). Scott Grimm has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Diansong Zhou, Liyue Huang, Yi Wang, Tommy B. Andersson, Martin C. Dyroff, Helen Winter, Stots B. Reele, Neil M. Richtand, James R. Halpert and Louise McNally. Their work appears in journals such as Drug Metabolism and Disposition, Xenobiotica, British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Language and Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact