Scott Gehler

641 citations
10 papers · 513 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Scott Gehler

9 papers receiving 511 citations

Peers

Scott Gehler
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Developmental Neuroscience 85
  • Cell Biology 227
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 223
  • Immunology and Allergy 58
  • Biophysics 19
Replace Timothy M.E. Scales with:
Timothy M.E. Scales United Kingdom
Witchuda Saengsawang Thailand
Giuseppe Condomitti Belgium
Motohiro Nozumi Japan
Jonathan K. Ivins United States
Yuechueng Liu United States
Rachel S. Ozer United States
Geneva Dickens United States
Veerle Baert Belgium
Ester Martı́n-Aparicio Spain
Scott Gehler relative to Timothy M.E. Scales United Kingdom Timothy M.E. Scales's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Timothy M.E. Scales · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Gehler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Gehler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Gehler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Gehler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Gehler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Gehler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Gehler. The network helps show where Scott Gehler may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Scott Gehler, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott Gehler Line = papers co-authored together Scott Gehler links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2004104
2 2004102
3 200998
4 200568
5 201349
6 200431
7 202026
8 201720
9 200715
10
Semaphorin3A Increases Focal Adhesion Formation to Shift the Relationship Between Cell Migration and Substratum Concentration Through a ROCK-dependent Mechanism
20160

About Scott Gehler

Scott Gehler is a scholar working on Cell Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Immunology and Allergy, Molecular Biology and Oncology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 513 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (8 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (5 papers), Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling (5 papers), Cell Adhesion Molecules Research (3 papers), Muscle Physiology and Disorders (1 paper), Bioactive natural compounds (1 paper), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (1 paper) and Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (85 citations), Cell Biology (227 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (223 citations), Immunology and Allergy (58 citations) and Biophysics (19 citations). Scott Gehler has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Paul C. Letourneau, James R. Bamburg, Alisa E. Shaw, Patrick D. Sarmiere, Gianluca Gallo, Patricia J. Keely, Kristin M. Riching, Suzanne M. Ponik, Tsan‐Ju Chen and Michele A. Wozniak. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Molecular Biology of the Cell, Critical Reviews in Eukaryotic Gene Expression, Anatomical Science International and Integrative Cancer Therapies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact