Integrative Cancer Therapies

1.4k papers and 30.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.4k papers published in Integrative Cancer Therapies in the last decades have received a total of 30.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Integrative Cancer Therapies usually cover Oncology (510 papers), Complementary and alternative medicine (392 papers) and Molecular Biology (303 papers) specifically the topics of Cancer survivorship and care (282 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (280 papers) and Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (125 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Integrative Cancer Therapies are Kenneth A. Conklin, Keith I. Block, Girija Kuttan, Carmia Borek, Daniel Slíva, Mark F. McCarty, Ralph W. Moss, Marja J. Verhoef, Will McClatchey and Dugald Seely.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Integrative Cancer Therapies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Integrative Cancer Therapies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Integrative Cancer Therapies.

Countries where authors publish in Integrative Cancer Therapies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Integrative Cancer Therapies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Integrative Cancer Therapies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Integrative Cancer Therapies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025