Critical Reviews in Eukaryotic Gene Expression

23.6k citations
875 papers · · active since 1990

Impact in

Papers in

    • Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research 60
    • MicroRNA in disease regulation 43
    • Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics 65
    • Bone Metabolism and Diseases 64
    • Nuclear Structure and Function 31

Critical Reviews in Eukaryotic Gene Expression

843 papers receiving 22.8k citations

Peers

Critical Reviews in Eukaryotic Gene Expression
Comparison fields: 5 of 176
  • Cancer Research 1.9k
  • Molecular Biology 8.4k
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 838
  • Genetics 706
  • Oncology 1.6k
Replace International Journal of Experimental Pathology with:
International Journal of Experimental Pathology United Kingdom
Aging and Disease China
Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences United States
Expert Reviews in Molecular Medicine United States
Progress in molecular biology and translational science United States
Advances in clinical chemistry United States
Journal of Cell Communication and Signaling United States
Pathobiology United States
Journal of Physiology and Biochemistry Spain
Periodontology 2000 United States
Critical Reviews in Eukaryotic Gene Expression relative to International Journal of Experimental Pathology United Kingdom International Journal of Experimental Pathology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
International Journal of Experimental Pathology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Critical Reviews in Eukaryotic Gene Expression

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Critical Reviews in Eukaryotic Gene Expression. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Critical Reviews in Eukaryotic Gene Expression with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Critical Reviews in Eukaryotic Gene Expression more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Critical Reviews in Eukaryotic Gene Expression

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Critical Reviews in Eukaryotic Gene Expression. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Critical Reviews in Eukaryotic Gene Expression.

About Critical Reviews in Eukaryotic Gene Expression

The 875 papers published in Critical Reviews in Eukaryotic Gene Expression in the last decades have received a total of 23.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Critical Reviews in Eukaryotic Gene Expression usually cover Cancer Research (133 papers), Molecular Biology (348 papers), Drug Discovery (1 paper), Oncology (71 papers) and Cell Biology (30 papers) specifically the topics of Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (65 papers), Bone Metabolism and Diseases (64 papers), Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (60 papers), MicroRNA in disease regulation (43 papers), Nuclear Structure and Function (31 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (18 papers), Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (17 papers) and Cancer Cells and Metastasis (14 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Critical Reviews in Eukaryotic Gene Expression are Narayanan Parameswaran, Sonika Patial, Muhammad Imran Qadir, Ego Seeman, Charles H. Turner, Alexander G. Robling, Gary H. Perdew, Timothy V. Beischlag, Brett D. Hollingshead and Renu A. Heller.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact