Scott Boyer

72 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

Scott Boyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 158
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 1.2k
  • Pharmacology 346
  • Toxicology 56
  • Molecular Biology 1.0k
  • Spectroscopy 229
Replace Hong Fang with:
Hong Fang United States
William S. Branham United States
Manuel Pastor Spain
Hongmao Sun United States
Leming Shi United States
Yannick Djoumbou-Feunang Canada
Jacques Hamon Switzerland
Lothar Terfloth Germany
Massimo Baroni Italy
Antonius ter Laak Germany
Scott Boyer relative to Hong Fang United States Hong Fang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Hong Fang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Boyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Boyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Boyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Boyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Boyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Boyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Boyer. The network helps show where Scott Boyer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott Boyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott Boyer Line = papers co-authored together Scott Boyer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 74 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014148
2
Circular fingerprints: flexible molecular descriptors with applications from physical chemistry to ADME.
2006137
3 201399
4 201492
5 200588
6 200988
7 200786
8 200785
9 201669
10 200666
11 201062
12 200362
13 200262
14 200759
15 201358
16 199055
17 200951
18 200249
19 201748
20 198947

About Scott Boyer

Scott Boyer is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Molecular Biology, Pharmacology, Materials Chemistry and Spectroscopy, having authored 74 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computational Drug Discovery Methods (32 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (8 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (8 papers), Machine Learning in Materials Science (8 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (6 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (4 papers), Chemistry and Chemical Engineering (4 papers) and Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (1.2k citations), Pharmacology (346 citations), Toxicology (56 citations), Molecular Biology (1.0k citations) and Spectroscopy (229 citations). Scott Boyer has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Lars Carlsson, Ulf Norinder, Martin Eklund, Catrin Hasselgren Arnby, Brian A. Larkins, John E. Mullet, James M. Smith, Mark A. Shotwell, Robert C. Glen and Ann‐Charlotte Egnell. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, The Plant Cell, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety and Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact