James M. Smith

244 papers receiving 5.1k citations

Peers

James M. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 207
  • Virology 715
  • Microbiology 367
  • Parasitology 374
  • Infectious Diseases 696
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 404
Replace Mads Melbye with:
Mads Melbye Denmark
Richard J. Roberts United States
Michael W. Parker Australia
Günter Weiß Austria
Li Liu China
D. Carleton Gajdusek United States
John L. Fahey United States
Helmut E. Meyer Germany
David W. Smith United States
Min Liu China
James M. Smith relative to Mads Melbye Denmark Mads Melbye's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Mads Melbye · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James M. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James M. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James M. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James M. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James M. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James M. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James M. Smith. The network helps show where James M. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James M. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James M. Smith Line = papers co-authored together James M. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 252 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1980242
2 2009163
3 2020160
4 2007138
5 2002135
6
Circular fingerprints: flexible molecular descriptors with applications from physical chemistry to ADME.
2006129
7 1998128
8 2001106
9 2015106
10 2007100
11 200193
12 198889
13 197988
14 201383
15 200780
16 198079
17 200577
18 199975
19 199069
20 197868

About James M. Smith

James M. Smith is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Virology, Infectious Diseases, Parasitology and Surgery, having authored 252 papers that have together received 5.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include HIV Research and Treatment (34 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (20 papers), Parasites and Host Interactions (18 papers), Reproductive tract infections research (14 papers), Parasite Biology and Host Interactions (14 papers), Helminth infection and control (9 papers), Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (8 papers) and Schizophrenia research and treatment (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Virology (715 citations), Microbiology (367 citations), Parasitology (374 citations), Infectious Diseases (696 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (404 citations). James M. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Roger K. Prichard, Gerald M. Mkoji, Harriet L. Robinson, Timothy L. Smith, L. Thomas Kucharski, Rama Rao Amara, Gerardo Ferbeyre, Robert Cedergren, Bakela Nare and Priya Srinivasan. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, International Journal for Parasitology, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses and Virology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact