James M. Smith

247 papers receiving 5.4k citations

Peers

James M. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 210
  • Virology 656
  • Parasitology 388
  • Microbiology 332
  • Infectious Diseases 606
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 396
Replace Richard A. Gibbs with:
Richard A. Gibbs United States
Richard J. Roberts United States
Michael W. Parker Australia
Stanley N. Cohen United States
Allison E. Aiello United States
Li Liu China
Günter Weiß Austria
D. Carleton Gajdusek United States
David W. Smith United States
Helmut E. Meyer Germany
James M. Smith relative to Richard A. Gibbs United States Richard A. Gibbs's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Richard A. Gibbs · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James M. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James M. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James M. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James M. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James M. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James M. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James M. Smith. The network helps show where James M. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James M. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James M. Smith Line = papers co-authored together James M. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 259 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1980264
2 2020171
3 2009167
4 2007148
5 2002140
6 1998137
7
Circular fingerprints: flexible molecular descriptors with applications from physical chemistry to ADME.
2006137
8 2007137
9 2015116
10 2001108
11 2001103
12 2005100
13 198894
14 197990
15 200786
16 198086
17 201384
18 195284
19 197875
20 199071

About James M. Smith

James M. Smith is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Virology, Infectious Diseases, Parasitology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 259 papers that have together received 6.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include HIV Research and Treatment (31 papers), Parasites and Host Interactions (18 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (15 papers), Parasite Biology and Host Interactions (14 papers), Reproductive tract infections research (12 papers), Irish and British Studies (9 papers), Helminth infection and control (9 papers) and Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Virology (656 citations), Parasitology (388 citations), Microbiology (332 citations), Infectious Diseases (606 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (396 citations). James M. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Roger K. Prichard, Gerald M. Mkoji, Harriet L. Robinson, Timothy L. Smith, L. Thomas Kucharski, Doris Α. Graber, Robert Cedergren, Gerardo Ferbeyre, Rama Rao Amara and Priya Srinivasan. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, International Journal for Parasitology, AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses and Journal of Medical Primatology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact