Scott Baker

17 papers receiving 769 citations

Peers

Scott Baker
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Sensory Systems 126
  • Physiology 310
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 226
  • Biological Psychiatry 23
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 154
Replace Junting Huang with:
Junting Huang Canada
Madhavi Pai United States
Feifei Liao China
H.-M. Reinold Germany
Farzana Karim United States
Erin N. Bobeck United States
Rebekah S. Vest United States
Corrado Carignani Italy
Zi-Zhen Wu United States
Moh Panesar United Kingdom
Scott Baker relative to Junting Huang Canada Junting Huang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×24.5×
Junting Huang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Baker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Baker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Baker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Baker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Baker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Baker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Baker. The network helps show where Scott Baker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott Baker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Scott Baker Line = papers co-authored together Scott Baker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2005158
2 2006149
3 201174
4 200969
5 201058
6 201050
7 200948
8 200836
9 200522
10 200721
11 201121
12 201221
13 201218
14 200618
15 201312
16 201310
17
Validation of human behavioral tests using ethanol as a CNS depressant model.
19858

About Scott Baker

Scott Baker is a scholar working on Physiology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Pharmacology and Neurology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 793 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (10 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (3 papers), Ion Channels and Receptors (2 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (2 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (2 papers), Ion Transport and Channel Regulation (1 paper) and Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (126 citations), Physiology (310 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (226 citations), Biological Psychiatry (23 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (154 citations). Scott Baker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Prisca Honoré, Jorge D. Brioni, Sonya G. Lehto, Mark L. Day, Gerard B. Fox, Andrew O. Stewart, Robert B. Moreland, Connie R. Faltynek, Chih‐Liang Chin and Jaymin Upadhyay. Their work appears in journals such as Pain, Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Biochemical Pharmacology and Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact