Moh Panesar
Impact in
- Sensory Systems top 5%
- Ion Channels and Receptors
-
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Papers in
-
- Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study 2
-
- Pain Mechanisms and Treatments 4
- Co-authors
- László Urbán (4 shared papers)Clive Gentry (3 shared papers)Katherine Walker (2 shared papers)Adam Kesingland (2 shared papers)Mark S. Nash (5 shared papers)Elizabeth A. Campbell (2 shared papers)Ivo Vranesic (1 shared paper)Edwin C. Johnson (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Pain (2 papers)Neuroscience (1 paper)Cell Reports (1 paper)Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (1 paper)Scientific Reports (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSwitzerlandUnited States
In The Last Decade
Moh Panesar
10 papers receiving 515 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Sensory Systems 110
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 205
- Physiology 224
- Gastroenterology 20
- Complementary and alternative medicine 28
Countries citing papers authored by Moh Panesar
This map shows the geographic impact of Moh Panesar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Moh Panesar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Moh Panesar more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Moh Panesar
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Moh Panesar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Moh Panesar. The network helps show where Moh Panesar may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Moh Panesar, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2001 | 149 | |
| 2 | 2000 | 68 | |
| 3 | 2000 | 67 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 44 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 41 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 39 | |
| 7 | 1998 | 38 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 37 | |
| 9 | 2005 | 35 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 20 |
About Moh Panesar
Moh Panesar is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Physiology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Sensory Systems and Pharmacology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 538 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (4 papers), Ion Channels and Receptors (3 papers), Pharmacological Effects of Natural Compounds (2 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (2 papers), Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (2 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (1 paper), Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones (1 paper) and Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (110 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (205 citations), Physiology (224 citations), Gastroenterology (20 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (28 citations). Moh Panesar has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include László Urbán, Clive Gentry, Katherine Walker, Adam Kesingland, Mark S. Nash, Elizabeth A. Campbell, Ivo Vranesic, Edwin C. Johnson, Will Spooren and Kurt Lingenhoehl. Their work appears in journals such as Pain, Neuroscience, Cell Reports, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.