Sarah Jane Blithe

444 citations
23 papers · 287 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Sarah Jane Blithe

22 papers receiving 272 citations

Peers

Sarah Jane Blithe
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Gender Studies 96
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 53
  • Sociology and Political Science 159
  • Communication 22
  • Social Psychology 46
Replace Olga Chapa with:
Olga Chapa United States
Emily F. Henderson United Kingdom
Astrid Podsiadlowski New Zealand
Oscar Rantatalo Sweden
Amy Diehl United States
Ola Lindberg Sweden
Nasima M. H. Carrim South Africa
Susan V. Iverson United States
Ilaria Boncori United Kingdom
Fabian Cannizzo Australia
Sarah Jane Blithe relative to Olga Chapa United States Olga Chapa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Olga Chapa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Jane Blithe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Jane Blithe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Jane Blithe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Jane Blithe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Jane Blithe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Jane Blithe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Jane Blithe. The network helps show where Sarah Jane Blithe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Sarah Jane Blithe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sarah Jane Blithe Line = papers co-authored together Sarah Jane Blithe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201558
2 201955
3 201641
4 201815
5 201713
6 202013
7
Stories of Service-Learning: Guidelines for Increasing Student Engagement with Digital Storytelling
201512
8 201512
9 201510
10 201410
11 20197
12 20227
13 20167
14 20215
15 20234
16 20194
17 20184
18 20222
19 20242
20 20232

About Sarah Jane Blithe

Sarah Jane Blithe is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies, Education, Political Science and International Relations and Health, having authored 23 papers that have together received 287 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender Diversity and Inequality (5 papers), Gun Ownership and Violence Research (3 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (3 papers), Emotional Labor in Professions (3 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (3 papers), Sex work and related issues (2 papers), Global Education and Multiculturalism (2 papers) and Management and Organizational Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (96 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (53 citations), Sociology and Political Science (159 citations), Communication (22 citations) and Social Psychology (46 citations). Sarah Jane Blithe has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Marta Elliott and Ann Medaille. Their work appears in journals such as Women s Studies in Communication, Management Communication Quarterly, Journal of Gender Studies, Culture and Organization and Gender Work and Organization.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact