Women s Studies in Communication

694 papers and 5.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 694 papers published in Women s Studies in Communication in the last decades have received a total of 5.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Women s Studies in Communication usually cover Gender Studies (307 papers), Sociology and Political Science (231 papers) and Philosophy (161 papers) specifically the topics of Gender, Feminism, and Media (192 papers), Rhetoric and Communication Studies (152 papers) and Media Studies and Communication (87 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Women s Studies in Communication are Rachel Griffin, Julia T. Wood, D. Lynn O’Brien Hallstein, Sarah J. Jackson, Shardé M. Davis, Paul Elliott Johnson, Katherine N. Kinnick, Jimmie Manning, Elise J. Dallimore and Marlene G. Fine.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Women s Studies in Communication

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Women s Studies in Communication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Women s Studies in Communication.

Countries where authors publish in Women s Studies in Communication

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Women s Studies in Communication. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Women s Studies in Communication with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Women s Studies in Communication more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025