Sara E. Wolf

401 citations
31 papers · 295 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Sara E. Wolf

28 papers receiving 271 citations

Peers

Sara E. Wolf
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Human-Computer Interaction 113
  • Library and Information Sciences 20
  • Philosophy 57
  • Computer Science Applications 24
  • Information Systems 74
Replace Richard J. Selfe with:
Richard J. Selfe United States
Çavuş Şahin Türkiye
Hara Bouta Greece
Gregory L. Waddoups United States
Marcus Childress United States
Carmen Pérez-Sabater Spain
Madeleine Sorapure United States
Ertuğrul Usta Türkiye
Charles Xiaoxue Wang United States
Liliana María Passerino Brazil
Sara E. Wolf relative to Richard J. Selfe United States Richard J. Selfe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×20×40×63×
Richard J. Selfe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sara E. Wolf

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sara E. Wolf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sara E. Wolf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sara E. Wolf more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sara E. Wolf

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sara E. Wolf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sara E. Wolf. The network helps show where Sara E. Wolf may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sara E. Wolf, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sara E. Wolf Line = papers co-authored together Sara E. Wolf links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201645
2
The Big Six Information Skills As a Metacognitive Scaffold: A Case Study
200338
3 202230
4 202425
5 202421
6 202317
7 202314
8 202312
9 202011
10 202211
11 20218
12 20257
13 20037
14 20247
15 20236
16 20226
17 20204
18 20234
19 20244
20 20243

About Sara E. Wolf

Sara E. Wolf is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Philosophy, Computer Science Applications, Information Systems and Education, having authored 31 papers that have together received 295 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (17 papers), Media, Religion, Digital Communication (7 papers), ICT in Developing Communities (5 papers), Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (3 papers), Online and Blended Learning (3 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (3 papers), Digital Media and Philosophy (3 papers) and Social Media and Politics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (113 citations), Library and Information Sciences (20 citations), Philosophy (57 citations), Computer Science Applications (24 citations) and Information Systems (74 citations). Sara E. Wolf has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jörn Hurtienne, Jung Won Hur, David Shannon, Thomas A. Brush, John W. Saye, Michael Jeffrey Daniel Hoefer, Caroline Claisse, Erik Wolf, Elizabeth A. Buie and Marc Erich Latoschik. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, Interacting with Computers, American Journal of Distance Education, i-com and Mentoring & Tutoring Partnership in Learning.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact