Sandra Wolfe Citty

17 papers receiving 474 citations

Sandra Wolfe Citty's Hit Papers

ASPEN Consensus Recommendations for Refeeding Syndrome 2020 · 231 citations
2310+2+4Years since publication50100150200

Peers

Sandra Wolfe Citty
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 61
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 165
  • Research and Theory 9
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 11
  • Physiology 200
Replace Mona Persenius with:
Mona Persenius Sweden
Luciano Santana-Cabrera Spain
Cheryl Zambroski United States
Silvia García‐Mayor Spain
Kerstin Wikby Sweden
Minn N. Yoon Canada
Lesley B. Milgrom United States
Thomas Pelgrim Netherlands
Immacolata Dall’Oglio Italy
Jennifer Kelly United Kingdom
Sandra Wolfe Citty relative to Mona Persenius Sweden Mona Persenius's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Mona Persenius · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sandra Wolfe Citty

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sandra Wolfe Citty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sandra Wolfe Citty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sandra Wolfe Citty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sandra Wolfe Citty

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sandra Wolfe Citty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sandra Wolfe Citty. The network helps show where Sandra Wolfe Citty may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sandra Wolfe Citty, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sandra Wolfe Citty Line = papers co-authored together Sandra Wolfe Citty links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1
ASPEN Consensus Recommendations for Refeeding Syndrome
Hit paper breakdown →
2020231
2 2018127
3 201734
4 201925
5 201915
6 201714
7 202011
8 20207
9 20106
10 20234
11 20244
12 20224
13 20143
14 20222
15 20251
16 20201
17 20251
18 20210

About Sandra Wolfe Citty

Sandra Wolfe Citty is a scholar working on Physiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Surgery, having authored 18 papers that have together received 490 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology (7 papers), Nutrition and Health in Aging (7 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (5 papers), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (2 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (2 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (2 papers), Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (2 papers) and Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (61 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (165 citations), Research and Theory (9 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (11 citations) and Physiology (200 citations). Sandra Wolfe Citty has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Toni L. Glover, Gail M. Keenan, Madison B. Smith, Margaret Ansell, Tamara Gonçalves Rezende Macieira, David S. Seres, June Greaves, Joshua da Silva, Stephen Adams and Kathleen M. Gura. Their work appears in journals such as Nutrition in Clinical Practice, Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, Journal of Patient Safety, Clinical Simulation in Nursing and Nurse Educator.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact