Nutrition in Clinical Practice

2.8k papers and 49.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.8k papers published in Nutrition in Clinical Practice in the last decades have received a total of 49.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Nutrition in Clinical Practice usually cover Nutrition and Dietetics (1.6k papers), Physiology (1.1k papers) and Surgery (640 papers) specifically the topics of Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology (1.4k papers), Nutrition and Health in Aging (872 papers) and Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (411 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nutrition in Clinical Practice are Leo Galland, Stephen A. McClave, Joyce Stechmiller, Daren K. Heyland, Debra S. Kovacevich, Susan F. Clark, Gail Cresci, Callum Livingstone, Gerard E. Mullin and Winston J. Craig.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Nutrition in Clinical Practice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Nutrition in Clinical Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nutrition in Clinical Practice.

Countries where authors publish in Nutrition in Clinical Practice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nutrition in Clinical Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nutrition in Clinical Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nutrition in Clinical Practice more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025