Sandra Schick

1.0k citations
17 papers · 615 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Sandra Schick

17 papers receiving 611 citations

Peers

Sandra Schick
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 148
  • Developmental Neuroscience 27
  • Biological Psychiatry 15
  • Molecular Biology 390
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 80
Replace Cheryl Marietta with:
Cheryl Marietta United States
Jianfeng Liang China
Latisha McDaniel United States
Rolando Meloni France
Myung‐Soon Yang South Korea
Zhiping Mi United States
Tomohiro Okuda Japan
Scott Davidson United Kingdom
Samantha Carreiro United States
Dabin Ren China
Sandra Schick relative to Cheryl Marietta United States Cheryl Marietta's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.3×
Cheryl Marietta · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sandra Schick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sandra Schick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sandra Schick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sandra Schick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sandra Schick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sandra Schick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sandra Schick. The network helps show where Sandra Schick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sandra Schick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sandra Schick Line = papers co-authored together Sandra Schick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2021100
2 201991
3 201677
4 200263
5 200552
6 200232
7 200230
8 201530
9 201029
10 202319
11 200519
12 201719
13 202117
14 202115
15 201511
16 200610
17 20211

About Sandra Schick

Sandra Schick is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Physiology, Neurology and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 17 papers that have together received 615 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (7 papers), Protein Degradation and Inhibitors (4 papers), Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer (3 papers), Alcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency (3 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (3 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (3 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (3 papers) and Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (148 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (27 citations), Biological Psychiatry (15 citations), Molecular Biology (390 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (80 citations). Sandra Schick has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ulrich Lutz, Werner Kolb, Michael D. Köhnke, Vijay Tiwari, I. Gaertner, Angela Garding, Sudhir Thakurela, Stefan Kubicek, Anil Batra and Neha Tiwari. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Genetics, Journal of Neural Transmission, Addiction Biology, Biological Psychiatry and Cell Discovery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact