Samuel Walpole

535 citations
16 papers · 386 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Samuel Walpole

16 papers receiving 382 citations

Peers

Samuel Walpole
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Physiology 39
  • Endocrinology 20
  • Molecular Biology 233
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 49
  • Biological Psychiatry 7
Replace Marco T. Rudolf with:
Marco T. Rudolf Germany
Daan van der Es Netherlands
Hyeongseop Jeong South Korea
Ali Masoudi United States
David M. Zuckerman United States
Michael Hoffmann Germany
Guizhen Fan United States
Mónica Montero-Lomelı́ Brazil
Anna‐Lena Gustavsson Sweden
Patrick Weber France
Samuel Walpole relative to Marco T. Rudolf Germany Marco T. Rudolf's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×17.5×
Marco T. Rudolf · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Samuel Walpole

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Samuel Walpole's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Samuel Walpole with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Samuel Walpole more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Samuel Walpole

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Samuel Walpole. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Samuel Walpole. The network helps show where Samuel Walpole may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Samuel Walpole, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Samuel Walpole Line = papers co-authored together Samuel Walpole links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 201850
2 202050
3 201848
4 201834
5 201832
6 201826
7 201923
8 201922
9 202121
10 201814
11 201814
12 201913
13 201813
14 202011
15 20248
16 20247

About Samuel Walpole

Samuel Walpole is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Physiology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 16 papers that have together received 386 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Protein Structure and Dynamics (4 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (2 papers), Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling (2 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (2 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (2 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (2 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (2 papers) and Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (39 citations), Endocrinology (20 citations), Molecular Biology (233 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (49 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (7 citations). Samuel Walpole has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Spain and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Jesús Angulo, Serena Monaco, Ridvan Nepravishta, Leanne Stokes, Nathalie Juge, Stefan Bidula, Lučka Bibič, Brett A. Cromer, Thomas Hicks and Martin Walsh. Their work appears in journals such as Chemistry - A European Journal, ChemBioChem, Scientific Reports, Nature Communications and Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact