Samuel E. Gluck

1.3k citations
64 papers · 883 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Samuel E. Gluck

57 papers receiving 857 citations

Peers

Samuel E. Gluck
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 115
  • Infectious Diseases 219
  • Health Informatics 15
  • Internal Medicine 30
  • Emergency Medicine 68
Replace Lisa Patterson with:
Lisa Patterson Canada
Kelsey M. Linstrum United States
Susana Hong United States
Nitender Goyal United States
Emily B. Brant United States
Kate Hayes Australia
Gohar Mosoyan United States
Ege Eroglu Australia
Tracey E. Roberts United Kingdom
Michelle P. Zeller Canada
Samuel E. Gluck relative to Lisa Patterson Canada Lisa Patterson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.4×
Lisa Patterson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Samuel E. Gluck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Samuel E. Gluck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Samuel E. Gluck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Samuel E. Gluck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Samuel E. Gluck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Samuel E. Gluck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Samuel E. Gluck. The network helps show where Samuel E. Gluck may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Samuel E. Gluck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Samuel E. Gluck Line = papers co-authored together Samuel E. Gluck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2021163
2 2022104
3 202290
4 202278
5 202170
6 200258
7 202046
8 202039
9 202029
10 202116
11 195812
12 201510
13 202310
14 20219
15 20179
16 20249
17 20228
18 20238
19 20238
20 20178

About Samuel E. Gluck

Samuel E. Gluck is a scholar working on Emergency Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, General Health Professions and Health Information Management, having authored 64 papers that have together received 883 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Emergency and Acute Care Studies (7 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (5 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (5 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers), Machine Learning in Healthcare (3 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (3 papers), Hospital Admissions and Outcomes (3 papers) and Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (115 citations), Infectious Diseases (219 citations), Health Informatics (15 citations), Internal Medicine (30 citations) and Emergency Medicine (68 citations). Samuel E. Gluck has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Bacchi, Adam M. Deane, Matthew J. Summers, Lee‐anne S. Chapple, Marianne J. Chapman, Timothy John Kleinig, Jim Jannes, Luke M. Weinel, Simon Andrea Koblar and Imre W. K. Kouw. Their work appears in journals such as Internal and Emergency Medicine, Australian Critical Care, Intensive Care Medicine, JAMA and Emergency Medicine Australasia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact