Sam Waller

868 citations
41 papers · 658 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Sam Waller

39 papers receiving 624 citations

Peers

Sam Waller
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 174
  • Human-Computer Interaction 252
  • Occupational Therapy 159
  • Demography 88
  • Safety Research 69
Replace Hua Dong with:
Hua Dong United Kingdom
Cherie Lebbon United Kingdom
Joy Goodman-Deane United Kingdom
Ian Michael Hosking United Kingdom
Molly Follette Story United States
Colette Nicolle United Kingdom
Ruth E. Sims United Kingdom
Wolfgang F. E. Preiser
Joy Goodman United Kingdom
Newell Alan F. United Kingdom
Sam Waller relative to Hua Dong United Kingdom Hua Dong's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Hua Dong · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sam Waller

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sam Waller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sam Waller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sam Waller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sam Waller

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sam Waller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sam Waller. The network helps show where Sam Waller may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Sam Waller, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sam Waller Line = papers co-authored together Sam Waller links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Inclusive design toolkit
2007129
2 2013123
3 201049
4 200935
5 201027
6 201827
7 201323
8 201323
9 202118
10 201116
11 201816
12 202115
13 201014
14 201314
15
Simulating vision loss: What levels of impairment are actually represented?
201311
16 201611
17
Estimating exclusion: a tool to help designers
201110
18 20099
19 20108
20 20138

About Sam Waller

Sam Waller is a scholar working on Human Factors and Ergonomics, Human-Computer Interaction, Occupational Therapy, Demography and Safety Research, having authored 41 papers that have together received 658 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Accessibility for Disabilities (23 papers), Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (18 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (16 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (6 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (6 papers), Disability Rights and Representation (5 papers), Persona Design and Applications (3 papers) and Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human Factors and Ergonomics (174 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (252 citations), Occupational Therapy (159 citations), Demography (88 citations) and Safety Research (69 citations). Sam Waller has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Spain and Australia. Frequent co-authors include P. John Clarkson, Ian Michael Hosking, Mike Bradley, Joy Goodman-Deane, Patrick Langdon, Carlos Cardoso, Michael D. Bradley, Keziah Latham, Ion Iriarte and Alaster Yoxall. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Ergonomics, Interacting with Computers, BMJ Open, Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics and Lecture notes in computer science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact