S Tucek

1.9k citations
61 papers · 1.7k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

S Tucek

59 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

S Tucek
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 973
  • Clinical Biochemistry 158
  • Molecular Biology 1.2k
  • Pharmacology 264
  • Biochemistry 119
Replace Myron Benuck with:
Myron Benuck United States
Vladimı́r Doležal Czechia
Elena Bogónez Spain
Louis A. Barker United States
R. L. Polak Netherlands
Ruth Lindmar Germany
OTTAVIO BARNABEI Italy
Frederick Wolfgram United States
Sheila Spanner United Kingdom
A. Cupello Italy
S Tucek relative to Myron Benuck United States Myron Benuck's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×
Myron Benuck · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by S Tucek

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S Tucek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S Tucek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S Tucek more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S Tucek

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S Tucek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S Tucek. The network helps show where S Tucek may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside S Tucek, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with S Tucek Line = papers co-authored together S Tucek links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995152
2 1974113
3 1985106
4 1996102
5 199490
6 196786
7 198877
8 197472
9 199065
10 199562
11
Comparison between grafts with intact nerves and standard free grafts of the rat extensor digitorum longus muscle.
198148
12 196645
13 196745
14 200144
15 199543
16 198543
17 196742
18 197042
19 198633
20 198032

About S Tucek

S Tucek is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Pharmacology, Neurology and Clinical Biochemistry, having authored 61 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (17 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (17 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (15 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (10 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (7 papers), Biochemical effects in animals (6 papers), Neurological Disorders and Treatments (5 papers) and Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (973 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (158 citations), Molecular Biology (1.2k citations), Pharmacology (264 citations) and Biochemistry (119 citations). S Tucek has collaborated with scholars based in Czechia, Italy and Slovakia. Frequent co-authors include Jan Proška, Shangcong Cheng, Vladimı́r Doležal, Jan Říčný, Esam E. El‐Fakahany, Ján Jakubík, M. Israël, Lucie Bačáková, Jiřı́ Nedoma and F. Vyskočil. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurochemistry, Molecular Pharmacology, Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, Nature and Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact