S. Treter

807 citations
14 papers · 673 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

    • Xenotransplantation and immune response 8
    • Pancreatic function and diabetes 2
    • Virus-based gene therapy research 4
    • Animal Genetics and Reproduction 3

S. Treter

14 papers receiving 653 citations

Peers

S. Treter
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Transplantation 42
  • Immunology and Allergy 57
  • Surgery 389
  • Genetics 226
  • Cancer Research 99
Replace Pierre Rollini with:
Pierre Rollini Switzerland
Geoffrey Camirand United States
Sim L. Tung United Kingdom
Anupama Ahuja United States
Theresa L. O’Keefe United States
Jana Gillies Canada
Sorina Tugulea United States
Dominic A. Boardman Canada
Thaddeus W. Mully United States
L. Kerrie United States
S. Treter relative to Pierre Rollini Switzerland Pierre Rollini's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Pierre Rollini · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by S. Treter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S. Treter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. Treter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. Treter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S. Treter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. Treter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. Treter. The network helps show where S. Treter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside S. Treter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with S. Treter Line = papers co-authored together S. Treter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 1995228
2 2000177
3 200153
4 201345
5 200043
6 200242
7
Peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization and leukapheresis in pigs.
199933
8 200022
9 20008
10 20006
11 20005
12 20025
13 20003
14 20003

About S. Treter

S. Treter is a scholar working on Surgery, Genetics, Immunology, Molecular Biology and Transplantation, having authored 14 papers that have together received 673 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Xenotransplantation and immune response (8 papers), Virus-based gene therapy research (4 papers), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (3 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (2 papers), Organ and Tissue Transplantation Research (2 papers), T-cell and B-cell Immunology (2 papers), Mast cells and histamine (1 paper) and Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Transplantation (42 citations), Immunology and Allergy (57 citations), Surgery (389 citations), Genetics (226 citations) and Cancer Research (99 citations). S. Treter has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Sandra Schneider, C Schick, J C Pena, Gary A. Silverman, Elizabeth M. Miller, M. Basker, Mary E. White‐Scharf, Michel Awwad, David H. Sachs and Satoshi Gojo. Their work appears in journals such as Xenotransplantation, Transplantation, Cellular Immunology, Annals of Surgical Oncology and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact