S. Thomas Forgue

28 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

S. Thomas Forgue
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Molecular Medicine 251
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 53
  • Pharmacology 443
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 208
  • Pharmacology 90
Replace John Lettieri with:
John Lettieri United States
Wen Chyi Shyu United States
Diansong Zhou United States
Shitalben Patel United States
John F. Rogers United States
Richard J. Fruncillo United States
Helen Winter United States
Patricia D. Williams United States
Bruce M. Tune United States
Arzu Selen United States
S. Thomas Forgue relative to John Lettieri United States John Lettieri's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
John Lettieri · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by S. Thomas Forgue

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of S. Thomas Forgue's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by S. Thomas Forgue with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites S. Thomas Forgue more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by S. Thomas Forgue

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by S. Thomas Forgue. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by S. Thomas Forgue. The network helps show where S. Thomas Forgue may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside S. Thomas Forgue, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with S. Thomas Forgue Line = papers co-authored together S. Thomas Forgue links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005228
2 1990112
3 1992110
4 198786
5 200683
6 200382
7 200569
8 199064
9 200649
10 199145
11 197931
12 198730
13 198226
14 197924
15 197820
16 200417
17 198715
18 200715
19 199613
20 199612

About S. Thomas Forgue

S. Thomas Forgue is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Oncology, Pharmacology, Molecular Medicine and Molecular Biology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (8 papers), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (5 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (5 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (5 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (3 papers), Antibiotic Use and Resistance (3 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (2 papers) and 14-3-3 protein interactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (251 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (53 citations), Pharmacology (443 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (208 citations) and Pharmacology (90 citations). S. Thomas Forgue has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Rashmi H. Barbhaiya, Kelly Pittman, Beverley Patterson, Alun Bedding, Malcolm I. Mitchell, Diane L. Phillips, Christopher D. Payne, Rebecca E. Wrishko, C A Knupp and Carol Gleason. Their work appears in journals such as Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Journal of Neurochemistry and British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact