Ruth Cromarty
Impact in
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Neural dynamics and brain function
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Papers in
-
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies 7
- EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces 6
- Neural dynamics and brain function 2
-
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research 6
- Co-authors
- John‐Paul Taylor (13 shared papers)John T. O’Brien (12 shared papers)Alan Thomas (8 shared papers)Luis R. Peraza (7 shared papers)Michael Firbank (7 shared papers)Sara Graziadio (5 shared papers)Julia Schumacher (6 shared papers)Paul C. Donaghy (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Clinical Neurophysiology (2 papers)Alzheimer s Research & Therapy (2 papers)Human Brain Mapping (1 paper)Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience (1 paper)NeuroImage Clinical (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomItalyChina
In The Last Decade
Ruth Cromarty
13 papers receiving 441 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Cognitive Neuroscience 210
- Psychiatry and Mental health 119
- Neurology 58
- Neurology 80
- Physiology 59
Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Cromarty
This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Cromarty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Cromarty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Cromarty more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Cromarty
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Cromarty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Cromarty. The network helps show where Ruth Cromarty may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ruth Cromarty, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 65 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 60 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 51 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 49 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 47 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 42 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 39 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 29 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 23 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 17 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 16 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 14 | |
| 13 | Colon cytology simplified using enteric coated encapsulated polyurethane foam as a cellular collecting agent. A preliminary report. | 1977 | 1 |
| 14 | 2024 | 0 |
About Ruth Cromarty
Ruth Cromarty is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Neurology, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 14 papers that have together received 453 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (7 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (6 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (6 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (2 papers) and Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (210 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (119 citations), Neurology (58 citations), Neurology (80 citations) and Physiology (59 citations). Ruth Cromarty has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and China. Frequent co-authors include John‐Paul Taylor, John T. O’Brien, Alan Thomas, Luis R. Peraza, Michael Firbank, Sara Graziadio, Julia Schumacher, Paul C. Donaghy, Calum A. Hamilton and Alison Killen. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Neurophysiology, Alzheimer s Research & Therapy, Human Brain Mapping, Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience and NeuroImage Clinical.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.