Evaluating flow properties of solids.1965 · 1.1k citations
What are hit papers?
Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if any of the following hold:
it has ≥500 total citations;
it reaches ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (the
threshold is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it);
it reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of RS Carr's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by RS Carr with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites RS Carr more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by RS Carr. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by RS Carr. The network helps show where RS Carr may publish in the future.
RS Carr is a scholar working on Pollution, Ocean Engineering, Water Science and Technology, Global and Planetary Change and Infectious Diseases, having authored 4 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (1 paper), Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal (1 paper), Water resources management and optimization (1 paper) and Flood Risk Assessment and Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (476 citations), Food Science (467 citations), Computational Mechanics (297 citations), Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (76 citations) and Drug Discovery (2 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.