Torben Schæfer

2.8k citations
47 papers · 2.4k · h-index 29

Impact in

Papers in

Torben Schæfer

47 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Torben Schæfer
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Pharmaceutical Science 558
  • Computational Mechanics 1.7k
  • Drug Discovery 2
  • Analytical Chemistry 70
  • Food Science 85
Replace Dominique Chulia with:
Dominique Chulia France
Klaus Knop Germany
Andrea Claudio Santomaso Italy
Lian X. Liu Australia
Kimio Kawakita Japan
Brian Armstrong Australia
Iyad Rashid Jordan
Tim Freeman United States
Thomas Quinten Belgium
Petr Zámostný Czechia
Torben Schæfer relative to Dominique Chulia France Dominique Chulia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×5.0×
Dominique Chulia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Torben Schæfer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Torben Schæfer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Torben Schæfer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Torben Schæfer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Torben Schæfer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Torben Schæfer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Torben Schæfer. The network helps show where Torben Schæfer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Torben Schæfer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Torben Schæfer Line = papers co-authored together Torben Schæfer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1987184
2 1996124
3 1985117
4 1990108
5 2005102
6 2001101
7 198597
8 200295
9 200085
10 199681
11 198574
12 198567
13 200166
14 198861
15 199960
16 200253
17 200449
18 199347
19 199445
20 199643

About Torben Schæfer

Torben Schæfer is a scholar working on Computational Mechanics, Pharmaceutical Science, Materials Chemistry, Food Science and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 47 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Granular flow and fluidized beds (39 papers), Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems (10 papers), Crystallization and Solubility Studies (4 papers), Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (2 papers), Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery (2 papers), Microencapsulation and Drying Processes (2 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer (2 papers) and Polymer crystallization and properties (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (558 citations), Computational Mechanics (1.7k citations), Drug Discovery (2 citations), Analytical Chemistry (70 citations) and Food Science (85 citations). Torben Schæfer has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Sweden and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Henning Gjelstrup Kristensen, Paul Martin Holm, Thomas Kvistgaard Vilhelmsen, Jakob Kristensen, Peter Kleinebudde, Per Holm, Mikko Ritala, Pirjo Luukkonen, Jouko K. Yliruusi and Anne Mari Juppo. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Pharmaceutics, European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Powder Technology, Pharmaceutical Development and Technology and European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact