Rose Wiles

5.2k citations
83 papers · 3.5k · h-index 35

Impact in

Papers in

Rose Wiles

79 papers receiving 3.2k citations

Peers

Rose Wiles
Comparison fields: 5 of 147
  • Rehabilitation 517
  • General Health Professions 698
  • Occupational Therapy 97
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 94
  • Sociology and Political Science 853
Replace Vicki A. Freedman with:
Vicki A. Freedman United States
Nancy Morrow‐Howell United States
Linda Lindsey Davis United States
Albine Moser Netherlands
Barbara Paterson Canada
Hal Kendig Australia
Richard M. Shewchuk United States
Susan K. Chase United States
Fong Chan United States
Tanya Packer Canada
Rose Wiles relative to Vicki A. Freedman United States Vicki A. Freedman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Vicki A. Freedman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rose Wiles

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rose Wiles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rose Wiles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rose Wiles more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rose Wiles

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rose Wiles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rose Wiles. The network helps show where Rose Wiles may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Rose Wiles, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rose Wiles Line = papers co-authored together Rose Wiles links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 83 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008182
2 1999160
3 2007150
4 2007121
5 2011118
6 2013117
7 2014117
8 2009112
9
Visual Ethics: Ethical Issues in Visual Research
2008108
10 2008101
11 199899
12 200897
13 199895
14 200290
15 200689
16 200688
17 200182
18 200482
19 200175
20 200669

About Rose Wiles

Rose Wiles is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Rehabilitation and Education, having authored 83 papers that have together received 3.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (14 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (10 papers), Participatory Visual Research Methods (9 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (8 papers), Data Analysis and Archiving (7 papers), Evaluation and Performance Assessment (5 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (4 papers) and Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (517 citations), General Health Professions (698 citations), Occupational Therapy (97 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (94 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (853 citations). Rose Wiles has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, New Zealand and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Graham Crow, Sue Heath, Vikki Charles, Ann Ashburn, Judy Robison, Sheila Payne, Cheryl Cott, Melanie Nind, Helen Pain and Caroline Murphy. Their work appears in journals such as Disability and Rehabilitation, Journal of Advanced Nursing, Physiotherapy, International Journal of Social Research Methodology and Qualitative Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact