Jon Prosser

1.3k citations
31 papers · 938 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Jon Prosser

28 papers receiving 798 citations

Peers

Jon Prosser
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 112
  • Speech and Hearing 92
  • Sociology and Political Science 566
  • Conservation 38
  • Education 305
Replace Dawn Mannay with:
Dawn Mannay United Kingdom
Anna Bagnoli United Kingdom
Marisol Clark‐Ibáñez United States
Richard Chalfen United States
Christopher Pole United Kingdom
Sara Lawrence-Lightfoot United States
Kimberly Powell United States
Ruth Vinz United States
Helen Kara United Kingdom
Ruth Leitch United Kingdom
Jon Prosser relative to Dawn Mannay United Kingdom Dawn Mannay's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Dawn Mannay · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jon Prosser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jon Prosser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jon Prosser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jon Prosser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jon Prosser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jon Prosser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jon Prosser. The network helps show where Jon Prosser may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Jon Prosser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jon Prosser Line = papers co-authored together Jon Prosser links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007161
2
Visual Ethics: Ethical Issues in Visual Research
2008118
3
Introducing Visual Methods
2008118
4 201070
5 201157
6 201256
7 200756
8 199950
9 199939
10 201136
11 200829
12 199228
13 199628
14
Film-making and ethnographic research
199823
15 201215
16 19999
17 20108
18 20067
19 20047
20 20077

About Jon Prosser

Jon Prosser is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Education and General Health Professions, having authored 31 papers that have together received 938 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Participatory Visual Research Methods (14 papers), Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (5 papers), Art Education and Development (4 papers), Educational Environments and Student Outcomes (3 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (3 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers), Photography and Visual Culture (2 papers) and Visual Culture and Art Theory (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Visual Arts and Performing Arts (112 citations), Speech and Hearing (92 citations), Sociology and Political Science (566 citations), Conservation (38 citations) and Education (305 citations). Jon Prosser has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Andrew Loxley, Rose Wiles, Andrew Clark, Anna Bagnoli, Sally Holland, Emma Renold, Katherine Davies, Catherine Burke, Amanda Coffey and Judy Robison. Their work appears in journals such as Visual Studies, Qualitative Research, Current Opinion in Immunology, British Educational Research Journal and Sociological Research Online.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact