Jon Prosser

1.3k citations
20 papers · 673 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Jon Prosser

20 papers receiving 578 citations

Peers

Jon Prosser
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 87
  • Speech and Hearing 66
  • Sociology and Political Science 398
  • Conservation 28
  • Education 208
Replace Ruth Vinz with:
Ruth Vinz United States
Maureen Murphy Canada
Rosemary C. Reilly Canada
Barbara Drennan
Georges Vigarello France
Katherine Wimpenny United Kingdom
Andrei Codrescu United States
Nicole Brown United Kingdom
Claudia W. Ruitenberg Canada
Christine Bold Canada
Jon Prosser relative to Ruth Vinz United States Ruth Vinz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Ruth Vinz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jon Prosser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jon Prosser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jon Prosser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jon Prosser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jon Prosser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jon Prosser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jon Prosser. The network helps show where Jon Prosser may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Jon Prosser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jon Prosser Line = papers co-authored together Jon Prosser links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2007142
2
Introducing Visual Methods
2008111
3
Visual Ethics: Ethical Issues in Visual Research
2008108
4 201057
5 201247
6 200743
7 199940
8 201126
9 199626
10 199224
11
Film-making and ethnographic research
199818
12 20067
13 20077
14 20046
15 20074
16 20012
17
The Darker Side of Visual Research
20082
18 20091
19
Becoming a School and the Development of School Culture.
19921
20 20081

About Jon Prosser

Jon Prosser is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Education, Visual Arts and Performing Arts and General Health Professions, having authored 20 papers that have together received 673 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Participatory Visual Research Methods (12 papers), Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (4 papers), Digital Storytelling and Education (2 papers), Art Education and Development (2 papers), Educational Environments and Student Outcomes (2 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (2 papers), Education and Technology Integration (2 papers) and Children's Rights and Participation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Visual Arts and Performing Arts (87 citations), Speech and Hearing (66 citations), Sociology and Political Science (398 citations), Conservation (28 citations) and Education (208 citations). Jon Prosser has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Andrew Loxley, Rose Wiles, Andrew Clark, Anna Bagnoli, Sally Holland, Emma Renold, Katherine Davies, Amanda Coffey, Judy Robison and Paul Henley. Their work appears in journals such as Visual Studies, Literature and Theology, Current Opinion in Immunology, Qualitative Research and British Educational Research Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact