Rose McCloskey

1.0k citations
61 papers · 657 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Rose McCloskey

49 papers receiving 638 citations

Peers

Rose McCloskey
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 41
  • Research and Theory 22
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 17
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 34
  • Emergency Medicine 74
Replace Joan Stanley with:
Joan Stanley United States
Margaret Keatings Canada
Donna J. Munroe United States
Elena O. Siegel United States
Jane Bostick United States
Margareta Asp Sweden
Mary Flatley United Kingdom
Les Fitzgerald Australia
Matthias Hoben Canada
Barbara Stover Gingerich United States
Rose McCloskey relative to Joan Stanley United States Joan Stanley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
Joan Stanley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rose McCloskey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rose McCloskey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rose McCloskey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rose McCloskey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rose McCloskey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rose McCloskey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rose McCloskey. The network helps show where Rose McCloskey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Rose McCloskey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rose McCloskey Line = papers co-authored together Rose McCloskey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202151
2 200447
3 201444
4 201141
5 202035
6 202033
7 200730
8 202130
9 200830
10 200429
11 201629
12 201528
13 201522
14 201921
15 201918
16 201218
17 201815
18 202113
19 201112
20 200911

About Rose McCloskey

Rose McCloskey is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Emergency Medicine, Psychiatry and Mental health, Health and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 61 papers that have together received 657 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (16 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (7 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (5 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (4 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (4 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (4 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers) and Healthcare Systems and Public Health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (41 citations), Research and Theory (22 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (17 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (34 citations) and Emergency Medicine (74 citations). Rose McCloskey has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Connie Stewart, Pamela Jarrett, Karen Furlong, Lisa Keeping‐Burke, Linda Slater, Lynn Nagle, Manal Kleib, Patricia Nicholson, Doug Smith and Brian Veitch. Their work appears in journals such as JBI Evidence Synthesis, Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine, Journal of Advanced Nursing, International Journal of Qualitative Methods and Health Research Policy and Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact