Jane Bostick

13 papers receiving 893 citations

Peers

Jane Bostick
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 236
  • General Health Professions 833
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 42
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 33
  • Research and Theory 18
Replace Silke Metzelthin with:
Silke Metzelthin Netherlands
Matthias Hoben Canada
Marcia Flesner United States
Mary Jane Koren United States
Oddvar Førland Norway
Christine Caffrey United States
Mary Flatley United Kingdom
Kasia Bail Australia
Marilyn Macdonald Canada
Mary Zwygart-Stauffacher United States
Jane Bostick relative to Silke Metzelthin Netherlands Silke Metzelthin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Silke Metzelthin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Bostick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Bostick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Bostick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Bostick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Bostick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Bostick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Bostick. The network helps show where Jane Bostick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Bostick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Bostick Line = papers co-authored together Jane Bostick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2006312
2 2004185
3 2001147
4 1999111
5 200475
6 200653
7 200035
8 200625
9 200324
10 20054
11 20033
12 20012
13
Nursing Quality Measurement: A Review of Nursing Studies 1995-2000
20021

About Jane Bostick

Jane Bostick is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Demography, Occupational Therapy and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 13 papers that have together received 977 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (10 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (4 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers), Health and Wellbeing Research (2 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers), Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (2 papers), Elder Abuse and Neglect (2 papers) and Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (236 citations), General Health Professions (833 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (42 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (33 citations) and Research and Theory (18 citations). Jane Bostick has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Slovenia. Frequent co-authors include Marilyn Rantz, Marcia Flesner, C. Jo Riggs, Vicki S. Conn, Meridean Maas, David R. Mehr, Lanis L. Hicks, Rose Porter, Richard Madsen and Gregory F. Petroski. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Nursing Care Quality, The Gerontologist, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, Journal of Professional Nursing and Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact